291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23407805)
1. Diagnostic Value of Pelvic MRI for Assessment of the Depth of Myometrial Invasion and Cervical Involvement in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison of New Versus Old FIGO Staging.
Zamani F; Goodarzi S; Hallaji F; Zamiri A; Deilami T; Malek M; Modarress Gilani M
Iran J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 9(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 23407805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraoperative frozen section assessment of myometrial invasion and histology of endometrial cancer using the revised FIGO staging system.
Ugaki H; Kimura T; Miyatake T; Ueda Y; Yoshino K; Matsuzaki S; Fujita M; Kimura T; Morii E; Enomoto T
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Oct; 21(7):1180-4. PubMed ID: 21795987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Magnetic Resonance Imaging for local preoperative staging in endometrial cancer: Nantes local experience].
Coussoou C; Laigle-Quérat V; Loussouarn D; Vaucel E; Frampas E
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Apr; 48(4):374-383. PubMed ID: 32058046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Value of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2009) staging criteria].
Du L; Lei Y; Li D; Qiu X; Liang B
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Jun; 32(7):1048-51. PubMed ID: 22820597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic efficacy of diffusion-weighted MRI for pre-operative assessment of myometrial and cervical invasion and pelvic lymph node metastasis in endometrial carcinoma.
Koplay M; Dogan NU; Erdogan H; Sivri M; Erol C; Nayman A; Karabagli P; Paksoy Y; Celik C
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2014 Oct; 58(5):538-46; quiz 648. PubMed ID: 25046775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of myometrial invasion in stage I-II endometrial cancer.
Sethasathien P; Charoenkwan K; Siriaunkgul S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(17):7061-4. PubMed ID: 25227791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Impact of 2009 FIGO staging system on the diagnostic value of preoperative MRI staging of endometrial carcinoma].
Yu XD; Ouyang H; Lin M; Zhou CW; Zhang R
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 33(9):692-6. PubMed ID: 22340052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Standard 1.5-T MRI of endometrial carcinomas: modest agreement between radiologists.
Haldorsen IS; Husby JA; Werner HM; Magnussen IJ; Rørvik J; Helland H; Trovik J; Salvesen ØO; Espeland A; Salvesen HB
Eur Radiol; 2012 Jul; 22(7):1601-11. PubMed ID: 22453859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of Pelvic MRI and Tumor Markers HE4 and CA125 to Predict Depth of Myometrial Invasion and Cervical Involvement in Endometrial Cancer.
Zamani N; Modares Gilani M; Zamani F; Zamani MH
J Family Reprod Health; 2015 Nov; 9(4):177-83. PubMed ID: 27047564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of cervical infiltration in Stage II endometrial cancer by different preoperative evaluation techniques (D&C, US, CT, MRI).
Pete I; Godény M; Tóth E; Radó J; Pete B; Pulay T
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2003; 24(6):517-22. PubMed ID: 14658593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023.
Berek JS; Matias-Guiu X; Creutzberg C; Fotopoulou C; Gaffney D; Kehoe S; Lindemann K; Mutch D; Concin N;
J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Sep; 34(5):e85. PubMed ID: 37593813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors affecting sonographic preoperative local staging of endometrial cancer.
Fischerova D; Frühauf F; Zikan M; Pinkavova I; Kocián R; Dundr P; Nemejcova K; Dusek L; Cibula D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 May; 43(5):575-85. PubMed ID: 24281994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: added benefits of MR imaging.
Beddy P; O'Neill AC; Yamamoto AK; Addley HC; Reinhold C; Sala E
Radiographics; 2012; 32(1):241-54. PubMed ID: 22236905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tumor stiffness measured by 3D magnetic resonance elastography can help predict the aggressiveness of endometrial carcinoma: preliminary findings.
Zhang L; Long X; Nijiati M; Zhang T; Li M; Deng Y; Kuang S; Xiao Y; Zhu J; He B; Chen J; Rossman P; Glaser KJ; Venkatesh SK; Ehman RL; Wang J
Cancer Imaging; 2021 Aug; 21(1):50. PubMed ID: 34454623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound improves diagnostic performance in endometrial cancer staging.
Green RW; Epstein E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jul; 56(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 31647145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can preoperative magnetic resonance imaging replace intraoperative frozen sectioning in the evaluation of myometrial invasion for early-stage endometrial carcinoma?
Karataşlı V; Çakır İ; Şahin H; Ayaz D; Sancı M
Ginekol Pol; 2019; 90(3):128-133. PubMed ID: 30950001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR staging accuracy for endometrial cancer based on the new FIGO stage.
Shin KE; Park BK; Kim CK; Bae DS; Song SY; Kim B
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):818-24. PubMed ID: 21742787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The incidence of pelvic lymph node metastasis by FIGO staging for patients with adequately surgically staged endometrial adenocarcinoma of endometrioid histology.
Chi DS; Barakat RR; Palayekar MJ; Levine DA; Sonoda Y; Alektiar K; Brown CL; Abu-Rustum NR
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2008; 18(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 18334008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing myometrial invasion absence in endometrial carcinoma.
Suh DS; Kim JK; Kim KR; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(9):990-3. PubMed ID: 19636979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Well differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus: a cancer unit or centre case?
Montalto SA; Hakmi A; Moth P; Raju KS; Coutts M; Papadopoulos AJ; Devaja O
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2009; 30(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 19317254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
