350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23409351)
1. Aortic valve hydrodynamics: considerations on the absence of sinuses of Valsalva.
Bottio T; Buratto E; Dal Lin C; Lika A; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Gerosa G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Nov; 21(6):718-23. PubMed ID: 23409351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The changing spectrum of bioprostheses hydrodynamic performance: considerations on in-vitro tests.
Bottio T; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Gerosa G
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2008 Oct; 7(5):750-4. PubMed ID: 18628343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Carpentier-Edwards Magna ease versus Magna valves: a comparison of in-vitro valve hydrodynamic performance.
Dal Lin C; Bottio T; Buratto E; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Savona V; Gerosa G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Jan; 21(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 22474752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel pulse duplicator system: evaluation of different valve prostheses.
Haaf P; Steiner M; Attmann T; Pfister G; Cremer J; Lutter G
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 57(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19169990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro comparison of different mechanical prostheses suitable for replacement of the systemic atrioventricular valve in children.
Bottio T; Dal Lin C; Lika A; Rizzoli G; Tarzia V; Buratto E; Gerosa G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Mar; 143(3):558-68. PubMed ID: 21890150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stress analysis of the aortic valve with and without the sinuses of valsalva.
Beck A; Thubrikar MJ; Robicsek F
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 11206754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The changing hydrodynamic performance of the decellularized intact porcine aortic root: considerations on in-vitro testing.
Bottio T; Tarzia V; Dal Lin C; Buratto E; Rizzoli G; Spina M; Gandaglia A; Naso F; Gerosa G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 Jul; 19(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 20845897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In-vitro testing of three totally supra-annular bileaflet mechanical valves: hydrodynamics in the Sheffield pulse duplicator.
Bottio T; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Gerosa G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Mar; 17(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 18512495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The combined role of sinuses of Valsalva and flow pulsatility improves energy loss of the aortic valve.
Salica A; Pisani G; Morbiducci U; Scaffa R; Massai D; Audenino A; Weltert L; Guerrieri Wolf L; De Paulis R
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Apr; 49(4):1222-7. PubMed ID: 26362428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trans-catheter valve-in-valve implantation: in vitro hydrodynamic performance of the SAPIEN+cloth trans-catheter heart valve in the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valves.
Walther T; Dehdashtian MM; Khanna R; Young E; Goldbrunner PJ; Lee W
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Nov; 40(5):1120-6. PubMed ID: 21466959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diastolic properties of the Sorin Solo, ATS 3F, Edwards Prima Plus and Medtronic Freestyle stentless valves: an independent in-vitro comparison.
Weltert L; Nardella S; Girola F; Scaffa R; Bellisario A; Maselli D; De Paulis R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Jan; 21(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 22474749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hemodynamic performance of fresh and calcified aortic valve prostheses in critical low stroke volume.
Dzemali O; Bakhtiary F; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P
J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 May; 17(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 18592929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hydrodynamic comparison of biological prostheses during progressive valve calcification in a simulated exercise situation. An in vitro study.
Bakhtiary F; Dzemali O; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(5):960-3. PubMed ID: 18774723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro comparison of bileaflet aortic heart valve prostheses. St. Jude Medical, CarboMedics, modified Edwards-Duromedics, and Sorin-Bicarbon valves.
Reul H; van Son JA; Steinseifer U; Schmitz B; Schmidt A; Schmitz C; Rau G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Sep; 106(3):412-20. PubMed ID: 8361181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the Medtronic Mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter.
Ruzicka DJ; Eichinger WB; Hettich IM; Bleiziffer S; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):426-33; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 18751473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro.
Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Walker PG; Watterson KG; Fisher J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 11297215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available bileaflet mechanical valves.
Bottio T; Caprili L; Casarotto D; Gerosa G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Sep; 128(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 15354108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
