These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23409535)
1. Procreative beneficence and in vitro gametogenesis. Bourne H; Douglas T; Savulescu J Monash Bioeth Rev; 2012 Sep; 30(2):29-48. PubMed ID: 23409535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Substituted judgment, procreative beneficence, and the Ashley treatment. Douglas T J Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 41(9):721-2. PubMed ID: 26304130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Wrongs, preferences, and the selection of children: a critique of Rebecca Bennett's argument against the principle of procreative beneficence. Herissone-Kelly P Bioethics; 2012 Oct; 26(8):447-54. PubMed ID: 21320140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The moral obligation to create children with the best chance of the best life. Savulescu J; Kahane G Bioethics; 2009 Jun; 23(5):274-90. PubMed ID: 19076124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. When intuition is not enough. Why the Principle of Procreative Beneficence must work much harder to justify its eugenic vision. Bennett R Bioethics; 2014 Nov; 28(9):447-55. PubMed ID: 23841936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the partiality of procreative beneficence: a critical note. Petersen TS J Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 41(9):771-4. PubMed ID: 25907895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The proper scope of the principle of procreative beneficence revisited. Holm S; Bennett R Monash Bioeth Rev; 2014; 32(1-2):22-32. PubMed ID: 25434062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Moral duty in the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Malm H Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(4):19-21. PubMed ID: 22452468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The fallacy of the Principle of Procreative Beneficence. Bennett R Bioethics; 2009 Jun; 23(5):265-73. PubMed ID: 18477055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A not-so-new eugenics. Harris and Savulescu on human enhancement. Sparrow R Hastings Cent Rep; 2011; 41(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 21329104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Case Against the Case for Procreative Beneficence (PB). Holland A Bioethics; 2016 Sep; 30(7):490-9. PubMed ID: 27000681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. First, do no harm: Generalized procreative non-maleficence. Saunders B Bioethics; 2017 Sep; 31(7):552-558. PubMed ID: 28786178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Duty-free: the non-obligatory nature of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Sayres LC; Magnus D Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 22452462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In favor of PGD: the moral duty to avoid harm argument. Martin AK; Baertschi B Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(4):12-3. PubMed ID: 22452464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A duty to discriminate? Wasserman D; Asch A Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(4):22-4. PubMed ID: 22452470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A duty to use IVF? Ladd R; Forman E Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(4):21-2. PubMed ID: 22452469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The ethics of PGD: what about the physician? Goldsammler M; Jotkowitz A Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(4):28-9. PubMed ID: 22452473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. In defence of person-affecting procreative beneficence. Magni SF Bioethics; 2021 Jun; 35(5):473-479. PubMed ID: 33811365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A wrongful case for parental tort liability. Francis LP; Silvers A Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(4):15-7. PubMed ID: 22452466 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]