These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23410725)

  • 1. Projection-based volume alignment.
    Yu L; Snapp RR; Ruiz T; Radermacher M
    J Struct Biol; 2013 May; 182(2):93-105. PubMed ID: 23410725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On cross-correlations, averages and noise in electron microscopy.
    Radermacher M; Ruiz T
    Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun; 2019 Jan; 75(Pt 1):12-18. PubMed ID: 30605121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-resolution cryo-electron microscopy on macromolecular complexes and cell organelles.
    Hoenger A
    Protoplasma; 2014 Mar; 251(2):417-27. PubMed ID: 24390311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fundamentals of three-dimensional reconstruction from projections.
    Penczek PA
    Methods Enzymol; 2010; 482():1-33. PubMed ID: 20888956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An integration of fast alignment and maximum-likelihood methods for electron subtomogram averaging and classification.
    Zhao Y; Zeng X; Guo Q; Xu M
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(13):i227-i236. PubMed ID: 29949977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Averaging of electron subtomograms and random conical tilt reconstructions through likelihood optimization.
    Scheres SHW; Melero R; Valle M; Carazo JM
    Structure; 2009 Dec; 17(12):1563-1572. PubMed ID: 20004160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Classification of heterogeneous electron microscopic projections into homogeneous subsets.
    Herman GT; Kalinowski M
    Ultramicroscopy; 2008 Mar; 108(4):327-38. PubMed ID: 17574340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A multiresolution approach to orientation assignment in 3D electron microscopy of single particles.
    Sorzano CO; Jonić S; El-Bez C; Carazo JM; De Carlo S; Thévenaz P; Unser M
    J Struct Biol; 2004 Jun; 146(3):381-92. PubMed ID: 15099579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PRIME: probabilistic initial 3D model generation for single-particle cryo-electron microscopy.
    Elmlund H; Elmlund D; Bengio S
    Structure; 2013 Aug; 21(8):1299-306. PubMed ID: 23931142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cryo-Electron Tomography and Subtomogram Averaging.
    Wan W; Briggs JA
    Methods Enzymol; 2016; 579():329-67. PubMed ID: 27572733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated target segmentation and real space fast alignment methods for high-throughput classification and averaging of crowded cryo-electron subtomograms.
    Xu M; Alber F
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Jul; 29(13):i274-82. PubMed ID: 23812994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Single particle electron microscopy reconstruction of the exosome complex using the random conical tilt method.
    Liu X; Wang HW
    J Vis Exp; 2011 Mar; (49):. PubMed ID: 21490573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 3D reconstruction and processing of volumetric data in cryo-electron tomography.
    Winkler H
    J Struct Biol; 2007 Jan; 157(1):126-37. PubMed ID: 16973379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated correlation of single particle tilt pairs for Random Conical Tilt and Orthogonal Tilt Reconstructions.
    Hauer F; Gerle C; Kirves JM; Stark H
    J Struct Biol; 2013 Feb; 181(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 23142631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Autofocused 3D classification of cryoelectron subtomograms.
    Chen Y; Pfeffer S; Fernández JJ; Sorzano CO; Förster F
    Structure; 2014 Oct; 22(10):1528-37. PubMed ID: 25242455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantifying resolution limiting factors in subtomogram averaged cryo-electron tomography using simulations.
    Voortman LM; Vulović M; Maletta M; Voigt A; Franken EM; Simonetti A; Peters PJ; van Vliet LJ; Rieger B
    J Struct Biol; 2014 Aug; 187(2):103-111. PubMed ID: 24998892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Macromolecular 3D SEM reconstruction strategies: signal to noise ratio and resolution.
    Woodward JD; Wepf RA
    Ultramicroscopy; 2014 Sep; 144():43-9. PubMed ID: 24830764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three novel accurate pixel-driven projection methods for 2D CT and 3D EPR imaging.
    Qiao Z; Redler G; Gui Z; Qian Y; Epel B; Halpern H
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(1):83-102. PubMed ID: 29036875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved metrics for comparing structures of macromolecular assemblies determined by 3D electron-microscopy.
    Joseph AP; Lagerstedt I; Patwardhan A; Topf M; Winn M
    J Struct Biol; 2017 Jul; 199(1):12-26. PubMed ID: 28552721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A statistically harmonized alignment-classification in image space enables accurate and robust alignment of noisy images in single particle analysis.
    Kawata M; Sato C
    J Electron Microsc (Tokyo); 2007 Jun; 56(3):83-92. PubMed ID: 17967811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.