297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23410982)
1. Learning curve of robotic assisted pyeloplasty for pediatric urology fellows.
Tasian GE; Wiebe DJ; Casale P
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4 Suppl):1622-6. PubMed ID: 23410982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Between Senior and Junior Surgeons.
Spampinato G; Binet A; Fourcade L; Mendoza Sagaon M; Villemagne T; Braik K; Grosos C; Lardy H; Ballouhey Q
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Apr; 31(4):478-483. PubMed ID: 33651635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic surgery start-up with a fellow as the console surgeon.
Reinhardt S; Ifaoui IB; Thorup J
Scand J Urol; 2017 Aug; 51(4):335-338. PubMed ID: 28398104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Learning curve of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in children: how to reach a level of excellence?
Dothan D; Raisin G; Jaber J; Kocherov S; Chertin B
J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):93-97. PubMed ID: 32333364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results.
Esposito C; Masieri L; Castagnetti M; Sforza S; Farina A; Cerulo M; Cini C; Del Conte F; Escolino M
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Dec; 15(6):667.e1-667.e8. PubMed ID: 31734119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transition from open to robotic-assisted pediatric pyeloplasty: a feasibility and outcome study.
O'Brien ST; Shukla AR
J Pediatr Urol; 2012 Jun; 8(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 21616719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis studying operative times and complications for a surgeon transitioning from laparoscopic to robot-assisted pediatric pyeloplasty: Defining proficiency and competency.
Stern N; Li Y; Wang PZ; Dave S
J Pediatr Urol; 2022 Dec; 18(6):822-829. PubMed ID: 36064506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantifying the Additional Difficulty of Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Re-Do Pyeloplasty: A Comparison of Primary and Re-Do Procedures.
Baek M; Silay MS; Au JK; Huang GO; Elizondo RA; Puttmann K; Janzen NK; Seth A; Roth DR; Koh CJ
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 May; 28(5):610-616. PubMed ID: 29406807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can proctoring affect the learning curve of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty? Experience at a high-volume pediatric robotic surgery center.
Bowen DK; Lindgren BW; Cheng EY; Gong EM
J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):63-67. PubMed ID: 27342871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotics in Pediatric Urology: Evolution and the Future.
Mittal S; Srinivasan A
Urol Clin North Am; 2021 Feb; 48(1):113-125. PubMed ID: 33218586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Editorial comment.
Lendvay TS; Akhavan A
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4 Suppl):1626-7. PubMed ID: 23791988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reply by authors.
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4 Suppl):1627. PubMed ID: 23791987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic pyeloplasty learning curve for a pediatric surgeon without previous laparoscopic pyeloplasty experience.
Planchamp T; Bento L; Mouttalib S; Belbahri I; Coustets B; Aissa DA; Abbo O
J Robot Surg; 2023 Dec; 17(6):2955-2962. PubMed ID: 37864128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is peri-operative urethral catheter drainage enough? The case for stentless pediatric robotic pyeloplasty.
Silva MV; Levy AC; Finkelstein JB; Van Batavia JP; Casale P
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Aug; 11(4):175.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26189590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does the use of 5 mm instruments affect the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in smaller working spaces? A comparative analysis of infants and older children.
Baek M; Silay MS; Au JK; Huang GO; Elizondo RA; Puttmann KT; Janzen NK; Seth A; Roth DR; Koh CJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Dec; 14(6):537.e1-537.e6. PubMed ID: 30007500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost analysis of pediatric robot-assisted and laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Casella DP; Fox JA; Schneck FX; Cannon GM; Ost MC
J Urol; 2013 Mar; 189(3):1083-6. PubMed ID: 23017518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Human capital gains associated with robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children compared to open pyeloplasty.
Behan JW; Kim SS; Dorey F; De Filippo RE; Chang AY; Hardy BE; Koh CJ
J Urol; 2011 Oct; 186(4 Suppl):1663-7. PubMed ID: 21862079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Design and validation of a low-cost, high-fidelity model for robotic pyeloplasty simulation training.
Timberlake MD; Garbens A; Schlomer BJ; Kavoussi NL; Kern AJM; Peters CA; Gahan JC
J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Jun; 16(3):332-339. PubMed ID: 32173325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Milestone assessment of minimally invasive surgery in Pediatric Urology fellowship programs.
Smith PH; Carpenter M; Herbst KW; Kim C
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Feb; 13(1):110.e1-110.e6. PubMed ID: 27697470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty as minimally invasive alternatives to the open approach for the treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction in infants: a multi-institutional comparison of outcomes and learning curves.
Andolfi C; Lombardo AM; Aizen J; Recabal X; Walker JP; Barashi NS; Reed F; Lopez PJ; Wilcox DT; Gundeti MS
World J Urol; 2022 Apr; 40(4):1049-1056. PubMed ID: 35044490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
