481 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23411725)
1. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15.
Stark PA; Myles PS; Burke JA
Anesthesiology; 2013 Jun; 118(6):1332-40. PubMed ID: 23411725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Translation and validation of the Danish version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15.
Kleif J; Edwards HM; Sort R; Vilandt J; Gögenur I
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2015 Aug; 59(7):912-20. PubMed ID: 25867135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychometric testing of the Chinese quality of recovery score.
Chan MT; Lo CC; Lok CK; Chan TW; Choi KC; Gin T
Anesth Analg; 2008 Oct; 107(4):1189-95. PubMed ID: 18806027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Patient evaluation of postoperative recovery. An evaluation of the QoR scores in 577 patients].
Eberhart LH; Greiner S; Geldner G; Wulf H
Anaesthesist; 2002 Jun; 51(6):463-6. PubMed ID: 12391532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40.
Myles PS; Weitkamp B; Jones K; Melick J; Hensen S
Br J Anaesth; 2000 Jan; 84(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 10740540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults.
Myles PS; Hunt JO; Nightingale CE; Fletcher H; Beh T; Tanil D; Nagy A; Rubinstein A; Ponsford JL
Anesth Analg; 1999 Jan; 88(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 9895071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Chinese Version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Score and Its Comparison with the Post-Operative Quality Recovery Scale.
Bu XS; Zhang J; Zuo YX
Patient; 2016 Jun; 9(3):251-9. PubMed ID: 26518201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the translated Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire in a French-speaking population.
Demumieux F; Ludes PO; Diemunsch P; Bennett-Guerrero E; Lujic M; Lefebvre F; Noll E
Br J Anaesth; 2020 Jun; 124(6):761-767. PubMed ID: 32303379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40: a quantitative systematic review.
Gornall BF; Myles PS; Smith CL; Burke JA; Leslie K; Pereira MJ; Bost JE; Kluivers KB; Nilsson UG; Tanaka Y; Forbes A
Br J Anaesth; 2013 Aug; 111(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 23471753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and evaluation of an obstetric quality-of-recovery score (ObsQoR-11) after elective Caesarean delivery.
Ciechanowicz S; Setty T; Robson E; Sathasivam C; Chazapis M; Dick J; Carvalho B; Sultan P
Br J Anaesth; 2019 Jan; 122(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 30579408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study.
Pitimana-Aree S; Udompanthurak S; Lapmahapaisan S; Tareerath M; Wangdee A
BMC Anesthesiol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):64. PubMed ID: 27538900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the Japanese version of the quality of recovery score QoR-40.
Tanaka Y; Wakita T; Fukuhara S; Nishiwada M; Inoue S; Kawaguchi M; Furuya H
J Anesth; 2011 Aug; 25(4):509-15. PubMed ID: 21626452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychometric evaluation of a quality of recovery score for the postanesthesia care unit-A preliminary validation study.
Kahl U; Brodersen K; Kaiser S; Krause L; Klinger R; Plümer L; Zöllner C; Fischer M
PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0289685. PubMed ID: 37582085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measuring quality of recovery-15 after day case surgery.
Chazapis M; Walker EM; Rooms MA; Kamming D; Moonesinghe SR
Br J Anaesth; 2016 Feb; 116(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 26787793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation and clinical utility of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 with enhanced recovery after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.
Yoon S; Joo H; Oh YM; Lee J; Bahk JH; Lee HJ
Br J Anaesth; 2020 Oct; 125(4):614-621. PubMed ID: 32703550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Myles PS; Shulman MA; Reilly J; Kasza J; Romero L
Br J Anaesth; 2022 Jun; 128(6):1029-1039. PubMed ID: 35430086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychometric evaluation of the modified quality of recovery score for the postanaesthesia care unit (QoR-PACU
Kahl U; Boehm A; Krause L; Klinger R; Stoimenov K; Zöllner C; Plümer L; Fischer M
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med; 2024 Jun; 43(3):101380. PubMed ID: 38499247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of the functional recovery index for ambulatory surgery and anesthesia.
Wong J; Tong D; De Silva Y; Abrishami A; Chung F
Anesthesiology; 2009 Mar; 110(3):596-602. PubMed ID: 19212260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire.
Lee JH; Ki M; Choi S; Woo CJ; Kim D; Lim H; Kim DC
Korean J Anesthesiol; 2021 Apr; 74(2):142-149. PubMed ID: 33121227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Translation and Validation of the Korean Version of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Score QoR-15.
Kim D; Kim JK; Yeo J
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():3456234. PubMed ID: 33123568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
