These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23412462)

  • 1. Effect of head position on cephalometric evaluation of the soft-tissue facial profile.
    Hoogeveen RC; Sanderink GC; Berkhout WE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(6):20120423. PubMed ID: 23412462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Natural Head Postures of Patients With Facial Asymmetry in Frontal View Are Corrected After Orthognathic Surgeries.
    Kim JY; Kang MH; You JY; Jee HG; Yi JW; Kim BH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 74(2):392-8. PubMed ID: 26212091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years.
    Bergman RT; Waschak J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Murphy NC
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23834271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthodontic soft-tissue parameters: a comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and the 3dMD imaging system.
    Metzger TE; Kula KS; Eckert GJ; Ghoneima AA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):672-81. PubMed ID: 24182583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles in Le Fort I osteotomy patients with Dolphin and Maxilim softwares.
    Nadjmi N; Tehranchi A; Azami N; Saedi B; Mollemans W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):654-62. PubMed ID: 24182581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of the integrated radiograph-photograph method to obtain natural head position in cephalometric diagnosis.
    Dvortsin DP; Ye Q; Pruim GJ; Dijkstra PU; Ren Y
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Sep; 81(5):889-94. PubMed ID: 21542723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup.
    Moerenhout BA; Gelaude F; Swennen GR; Casselman JW; Van Der Sloten J; Mommaerts MY
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 18815053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional cephalometry for orthognathic planning: Normative data and analyses.
    Wang RH; Ho CT; Lin HH; Lo LJ
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Jan; 119(1 Pt 2):191-203. PubMed ID: 31003919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimated natural head position and facial morphology.
    Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Apr; 121(4):364-8. PubMed ID: 11997760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vertical photogrammetric evaluation of the soft tissue profiles of two different racial groups: a comparative study.
    Diouf JS; Ngom PI; Fadiga MS; Badiane A; Diop-Ba K; Ndiaye M; Diagne F
    Int Orthod; 2014 Dec; 12(4):443-57. PubMed ID: 25457394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Holdaway measurement norms in Turkish adults.
    Sahin Sağlam AM
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(10):757-62. PubMed ID: 12553619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position.
    Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Sanderink G
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 19106265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
    Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Maal T; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 20044238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Tartaglia G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Apr; 103(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 8480698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Positional changes of oropharyngeal structures due to gravity in the upright and supine positions.
    Sutthiprapaporn P; Tanimoto K; Ohtsuka M; Nagasaki T; Iida Y; Katsumata A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Mar; 37(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 18316503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Divergence between CBCT and Optical Scans for Soft Tissue Analysis and Cephalometry in Facial Imaging: A cross-sectional study on healthy adults.
    Farronato M; Cenzato N; Crispino R; Tartaglia FC; Biagi R; Baldini B; Maspero C
    Int Orthod; 2024 Jun; 22(2):100845. PubMed ID: 38350255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrospective evaluation of facial soft tissue cephalometric parameters in adolescents with normal occlusion.
    Poosti M; Ramezanzadeh B; Salehi T; Rashed R
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(2):15-8. PubMed ID: 20687311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Croatians using of linear measurements.
    Milosević SA; Varga ML; Slaj M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 19(1):251-8. PubMed ID: 18216697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.