These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23412462)
21. Accuracy of three-dimensional soft tissue simulation in bimaxillary osteotomies. Liebregts J; Xi T; Timmermans M; de Koning M; Bergé S; Hoppenreijs T; Maal T J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 43(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 25637495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. "Ten-point" 3D cephalometric analysis using low-dosage cone beam computed tomography. Farronato G; Garagiola U; Dominici A; Periti G; de Nardi S; Carletti V; Farronato D Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 20529623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [The assessment of the facial profile in relation to head posture]. Pancherz H; Milat AM Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1994 Jun; 55(3):111-8. PubMed ID: 8045482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Head posture and cephalometric analyses: an integrated photographic/radiographic technique. Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Germanò D; Dalloca LL; Miani A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Sep; 106(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 8074090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. Berco M; Rigali PH; Miner RM; DeLuca S; Anderson NK; Will LA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):17.e1-9; discussion 17-8. PubMed ID: 19577142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views. Ludlow JB; Gubler M; Cevidanes L; Mol A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):312.e1-10; discussion 312-3. PubMed ID: 19732656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of three-dimensional soft tissue predictions in orthognathic surgery after Le Fort I advancement osteotomies. Ullah R; Turner PJ; Khambay BS Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Feb; 53(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 25432431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CT. Katkar RA; Kummet C; Dawson D; Moreno Uribe L; Allareddy V; Finkelstein M; Ruprecht A Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130059. PubMed ID: 23833319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The measurement of craniocervical posture: a simple method to evaluate head position. Cuccia AM; Carola C Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 73(12):1732-6. PubMed ID: 19786307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Changes in natural head position after orthognathic surgery in skeletal Class III patients. Cho D; Choi DS; Jang I; Cha BK Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 26038079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Are orthodontic landmarks and variables in digital cephalometric radiography taken in fixed and natural head positions reliable? Giannopoulou MA; Kondylidou-Sidira AC; Papadopoulos MA; Athanasiou AE Int Orthod; 2020 Mar; 18(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 31495758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cone beam tomographic study of facial structures characteristics at rest and wide smile, and their correlation with the facial types. Martins LF; Vigorito JW Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(6):38-44. PubMed ID: 24351148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Changes in the facial soft-tissue profile after mandibular orthognathic surgery. Rupperti S; Winterhalder P; Rudzki I; Mast G; Holberg C Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1771-1776. PubMed ID: 30173318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera. Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reliability of cone beam CT for morphometry of nasolabial soft tissue in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. Xu W; Lu R; Hu Y; Cao L; Wang T; Tan H; Meng X; Ming Y; Zheng L J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(1):195-206. PubMed ID: 34719475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of chin position on natural head orientation reproducibility. Ahangar-Atashi MH; Kachoei M Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2011 May; 16(3):e317-22. PubMed ID: 21196895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study. Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1710-3. PubMed ID: 25203572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of mandibular advancement on the natural position of the head: a preliminary study of 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis. Lin X; Liu Y; Edwards SP Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 51(7):e178-82. PubMed ID: 23566537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls. van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Changes in face topography from supine-to-upright position-And soft tissue correction values for craniofacial identification. Munn L; Stephan CN Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():40-50. PubMed ID: 29852367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]