These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23412582)

  • 1. Mental arithmetic and non-speech office noise: an exploration of interference-by-content.
    Perham N; Hodgetts H; Banbury S
    Noise Health; 2013; 15(62):73-8. PubMed ID: 23412582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Open-plan office noise: the susceptibility and suitability of different cognitive tasks for work in the presence of irrelevant speech.
    Jahncke H
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(61):315-20. PubMed ID: 23257585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Office noise: Can headphones and masking sound attenuate distraction by background speech?
    Jahncke H; Björkeholm P; Marsh JE; Odelius J; Sörqvist P
    Work; 2016 Nov; 55(3):505-513. PubMed ID: 27768004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of prior exposure to office noise and music on aspects of working memory.
    Smith A; Waters B; Jones H
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):235-43. PubMed ID: 20871178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Effect of noise in submarine compartment on signal discrimination and arithmetic performance].
    Hu Z; Liang Z; Shi X; Tang Z
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 1997 Jun; 10(3):214-6. PubMed ID: 11540575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Task-specific auditory distraction in serial recall and mental arithmetic.
    Kattner F; Hanl S; Paul L; Ellermeier W
    Mem Cognit; 2023 May; 51(4):930-951. PubMed ID: 36239898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of rehearsal in a novel call center-type task.
    Perham N; Banbury S
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(56):1-5. PubMed ID: 22387706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of road traffic noise on cognitive performance in attention-based tasks depends on noise level even within moderate-level ranges.
    Schlittmeier SJ; Feil A; Liebl A; Hellbr Ck JR
    Noise Health; 2015; 17(76):148-57. PubMed ID: 25913554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-modal distraction by background speech: what role for meaning?
    Marsh JE; Jones DM
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):210-6. PubMed ID: 20871175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Objective measures of listening effort: effects of background noise and noise reduction.
    Sarampalis A; Kalluri S; Edwards B; Hafter E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 52(5):1230-40. PubMed ID: 19380604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can the irrelevant speech effect turn into a stimulus suffix effect?
    Schlittmeier SJ; Hellbrück J; Klatte M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 18421641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?
    Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 18194067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance, fatigue and stress in open-plan offices: the effects of noise and restoration on hearing impaired and normal hearing individuals.
    Jahncke H; Halin N
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(60):260-72. PubMed ID: 23117542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    Cognition; 2009 Jan; 110(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 19081558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Auditory localization and speech perception in noise. Preliminary study concerning 5 cases of perceptual deafness].
    Canévet G; Santon F; Scharf B
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1986; 103(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 3706968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech versus non-speech as irrelevant sound: controlling acoustic variation.
    Little JS; Martin FH; Thomson RH
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Sep; 85(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 20553792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech-in-noise perception deficit in adults with dyslexia: effects of background type and listening configuration.
    Dole M; Hoen M; Meunier F
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1543-52. PubMed ID: 22445915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distraction of Mental Arithmetic by Background Speech.
    Perham N; Marsh JE; Clarkson M; Lawrence R; Sörqvist P
    Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 63(3):141-9. PubMed ID: 27404982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Noise and office work].
    Cirillo E; D'Alba M; Martellotta F
    Med Lav; 2006; 97(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 17219764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.