These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23412584)

  • 1. Unclear whether energy-based vessel sealing in vaginal hysterectomy is superior to conventional clamping and suturing.
    Kroft J; Selk A
    Evid Based Med; 2013 Oct; 18(5):180-1. PubMed ID: 23412584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional clamping and suturing for vaginal hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
    Lakeman MM; Roovers JP
    BJOG; 2013 May; 120(6):777. PubMed ID: 23565958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional clamping and suturing for vaginal hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
    Soreefan AH; Beebeejaun MS
    BJOG; 2013 May; 120(6):776-7. PubMed ID: 23565956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional clamping and suturing for vaginal hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
    Lakeman MM; The S; Schellart RP; Dietz V; ter Haar JF; Thurkow A; Scholten PC; Dijkgraaf MG; Roovers JP
    BJOG; 2012 Nov; 119(12):1473-82. PubMed ID: 22925365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional clamping and suturing for total abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized trial.
    Lakeman M; Kruitwagen RF; Vos MC; Roovers JP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):547-53. PubMed ID: 18619923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outpatient vaginal hysterectomy: Comparison of conventional suture ligature versus electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing.
    Giraudet G; Lucot JP; Sanz F; Rubod C; Collinet P; Cosson M
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 May; 46(5):399-404. PubMed ID: 28934083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Safety and efficacy of using advanced electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy in morbidly obese patients: a retrospective cohort analysis.
    Karacan T; Ozyurek E; Wetherilt LS; Kiyak H; Yilmaz S; Kaya E
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(10):523-529. PubMed ID: 29192412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bipolar coagulation with the BiClamp forceps versus conventional suture ligation: a multicenter randomized controlled trial in 175 vaginal hysterectomy patients.
    Zubke W; Hornung R; Wässerer S; Hucke J; Füllers U; Werner C; Schmitz P; Lobodasch K; Hammermüller U; Wojdat R; Volz J; De Wilde RL; Wallwiener D
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Nov; 280(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 19252920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The use of ThermoStapler--bipolar vessel sealing system in vaginal hysterectomy].
    Malinowski A; Pawłowska N; Wojciechowski M
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Dec; 79(12):850-5. PubMed ID: 19175042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized study of bipolar vessel sealing system versus conventional suture ligature for vaginal hysterectomy.
    Silva-Filho AL; Rodrigues AM; Vale de Castro Monteiro M; da Rosa DG; Pereira e Silva YM; Werneck RA; Bavoso N; Triginelli SA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Oct; 146(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 19380188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Energy-based vessel sealing in vaginal hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kroft J; Selk A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Nov; 118(5):1127-1136. PubMed ID: 22015881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Vaginal hysterectomy using electrofusion: a study of 96 cases].
    Dubuisson J; Golfier F; Massoud M; Benchaib M; Bryssine B; Raudrant D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb; 37(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 18068907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Painless hysterectomy: an innovative technique].
    Clavé H; Niccolaï P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2003 Jun; 32(4):375-80. PubMed ID: 12843887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Postoperative pain after hysterectomy through vaginal routes using electro surgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional suture ligature].
    Douay N; Belot F; Bader G; Guyot B; Heitz D; Fauconnier A
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007; 35(7-8):632-6. PubMed ID: 17587630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing technique: a randomized controlled trial.
    Allam IS; Makled AK; Gomaa IA; El Bishry GM; Bayoumy HA; Ali DF
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1341-5. PubMed ID: 25524534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bipolar vessel sealing increases operative safety in laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
    Nouri K; Ott J; Demmel M; Promberger R; Huber JC; Mayerhofer K
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jan; 283(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 20039049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy.
    Cronjé HS; de Coning EC
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Dec; 91(3):243-5. PubMed ID: 16243338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy in patients with different degrees of operative difficulty: a randomised controlled trial.
    Elhao M; Abdallah K; Serag I; El-Laithy M; Agur W
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Nov; 147(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 19729238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New suturing technique for robotic-assisted vaginal cuff closure during single-site hysterectomy.
    Shin SJ; Chung H; Kwon SH; Cha SD; Cho CH
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 27550318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Vaginal hysterectomy leniens: intrafascial technique].
    Tapia JE
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2004 Oct; 44(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 15459520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.