468 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23412754)
1. Variability in quantitative and qualitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound and frequency domain optical coherence tomography.
Abnousi F; Waseda K; Kume T; Otake H; Kawarada O; Yong CM; Fitzgerald PJ; Honda Y; Yeung AC; Fearon WF
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E192-9. PubMed ID: 23412754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of observer variability and reliability in the assessment of stent deployment: the OCTIVUS study.
Magnus PC; Jayne JE; Garcia-Garcia HM; Swart M; van Es GA; Tijssen J; Kaplan AV
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25620044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
Fujino Y; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Wang W; Yamamoto H; Chamié D; Kanaya T; Mehanna E; Tahara S; Nakamura S; Costa MA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E173-83. PubMed ID: 23359350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of longitudinal geometric measurement in human coronary arteries between frequency-domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.
Liu Y; Shimamura K; Kubo T; Tanaka A; Kitabata H; Ino Y; Tanimoto T; Shiono Y; Orii M; Yamano T; Yamaguchi T; Hirata K; Imanishi T; Akasaka T
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Feb; 30(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 24272334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interstudy reproducibility of the second generation, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in patients with coronary artery disease and comparison with intravascular ultrasound: a study applying automated contour detection.
Jamil Z; Tearney G; Bruining N; Sihan K; van Soest G; Ligthart J; van Domburg R; Bouma B; Regar E
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 29(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 22639296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study.
Kubo T; Akasaka T; Shite J; Suzuki T; Uemura S; Yu B; Kozuma K; Kitabata H; Shinke T; Habara M; Saito Y; Hou J; Suzuki N; Zhang S
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 24011777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention.
Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Sirbu V; Musumeci G; Lortkipanidze N; Fujino Y; Wang W; Nakamura S; Erglis A; Guagliumi G; Costa MA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar; 6(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 23517833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In Vivo Calcium Detection by Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Angiography.
Wang X; Matsumura M; Mintz GS; Lee T; Zhang W; Cao Y; Fujino A; Lin Y; Usui E; Kanaji Y; Murai T; Yonetsu T; Kakuta T; Maehara A
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Aug; 10(8):869-879. PubMed ID: 28797408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of frequency-domain optical coherence tomography guidance for optimal coronary stent implantation in comparison with intravascular ultrasound guidance.
Habara M; Nasu K; Terashima M; Kaneda H; Yokota D; Ko E; Ito T; Kurita T; Tanaka N; Kimura M; Ito T; Kinoshita Y; Tsuchikane E; Asakura K; Asakura Y; Katoh O; Suzuki T
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr; 5(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 22456026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vivo comparison of lumen dimensions measured by time domain-, and frequency domain-optical coherence tomography, and intravascular ultrasound.
Kim SJ; Lee H; Kato K; Yonetsu T; Jang IK
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jun; 29(5):967-75. PubMed ID: 23292151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discrepancy between frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in human coronary arteries and in a phantom in vitro coronary model.
Kim IC; Nam CW; Cho YK; Park HS; Yoon HJ; Kim H; Chung IS; Han S; Hur SH; Kim YN; Kim KB
Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 221():860-6. PubMed ID: 27434362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intra- and interobserver reliability and intra-catheter reproducibility using frequency domain optical coherence tomography for the evaluation of morphometric stent parameters and qualitative assessment of stent strut coverage.
Antonsen L; Thayssen P; Junker A; Veien KT; Hansen HS; Hansen KN; Hougaard M; Jensen LO
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2015 Dec; 16(8):469-77. PubMed ID: 26475731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intra-stent tissue evaluation within bare metal and drug-eluting stents > 3 years since implantation in patients with mild to moderate neointimal proliferation using optical coherence tomography and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound.
Kitabata H; Loh JP; Pendyala LK; Omar A; Ota H; Minha S; Magalhaes MA; Torguson R; Chen F; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Apr; 15(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 24767313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imaging assessment and accuracy in coronary artery autopsy: comparison of frequency-domain optical coherence tomography with intravascular ultrasound and histology.
Shimokado A; Kubo T; Matsuo Y; Ino Y; Shiono Y; Shimamura K; Katayama Y; Taruya A; Nishiguchi T; Kashiwagi M; Kitabata H; Tanaka A; Hozumi T; Akasaka T
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Oct; 35(10):1785-1790. PubMed ID: 31175528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accurate and reproducible reconstruction of coronary arteries and endothelial shear stress calculation using 3D OCT: comparative study to 3D IVUS and 3D QCA.
Toutouzas K; Chatzizisis YS; Riga M; Giannopoulos A; Antoniadis AP; Tu S; Fujino Y; Mitsouras D; Doulaverakis C; Tsampoulatidis I; Koutkias VG; Bouki K; Li Y; Chouvarda I; Cheimariotis G; Maglaveras N; Kompatsiaris I; Nakamura S; Reiber JH; Rybicki F; Karvounis H; Stefanadis C; Tousoulis D; Giannoglou GD
Atherosclerosis; 2015 Jun; 240(2):510-9. PubMed ID: 25932791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in detecting neointimal healing patterns after stent implantation.
Kochman J; Pietrasik A; Rdzanak A; Jąkała J; Zasada W; Scibisz A; Kołtowski L; Proniewska K; Pociask E; Legutko J
Kardiol Pol; 2014; 72(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 24293141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative precision of optical frequency domain imaging: direct comparison with frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.
Kobayashi Y; Kitahara H; Tanaka S; Okada K; Kimura T; Ikeno F; Yock PG; Fitzgerald PJ; Honda Y
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2016 Apr; 31(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 26271203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anatomically correct three-dimensional coronary artery reconstruction using frequency domain optical coherence tomographic and angiographic data: head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound for endothelial shear stress assessment in humans.
Papafaklis MI; Bourantas CV; Yonetsu T; Vergallo R; Kotsia A; Nakatani S; Lakkas LS; Athanasiou LS; Naka KK; Fotiadis DI; Feldman CL; Stone PH; Serruys PW; Jang IK; Michalis LK
EuroIntervention; 2015 Aug; 11(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 24974809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. First in-human evaluation of a novel intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography system for intracoronary imaging.
Akl E; Pinilla-Echeverri N; Garcia-Garcia HM; Mehta SR; Dan K; Kuku KO; Courtney BK; Sheth T
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Feb; 99(3):686-698. PubMed ID: 34792273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
