These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23413079)

  • 1. Where should we measure the entrance air kerma rate during acceptance testing of the automatic dose control of a fluoroscopic system?
    Fukuda A; Miyati T; Matsubara K
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul; 6(2):313-6. PubMed ID: 23413079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of automatic dose rate control for flat panel imaging using a spatial frequency domain figure of merit.
    Dehairs M; Bosmans H; Desmet W; Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 62(16):6610-6630. PubMed ID: 28632501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The operation logic of automatic dose control of fluoroscopy system in conjunction with spectral shaping filters.
    Lin PJ
    Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3169-72. PubMed ID: 17879779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating Fluoroscopic Peak Skin Dose Using Manual Calculations.
    Berry KE
    Health Phys; 2018 Jun; 114(6):649-653. PubMed ID: 29697515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Nationwide Survey of Medical Radiation Exposure on Cardiovascular Examinations in Japan].
    Ishibashi T; Takei Y; Sakamoto H; Yamashita Y; Kato M; Tsukamoto A; Matsumoto K; Mizutani H; Suzuki S; Katoh Y; Chida K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2020; 76(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 31956188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Functionality and operation of fluoroscopic automatic brightness control/automatic dose rate control logic in modern cardiovascular and interventional angiography systems: a report of Task Group 125 Radiography/Fluoroscopy Subcommittee, Imaging Physics Committee, Science Council.
    Rauch P; Lin PJ; Balter S; Fukuda A; Goode A; Hartwell G; LaFrance T; Nickoloff E; Shepard J; Strauss K
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2826-8. PubMed ID: 22559654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic monitoring of localized skin dose with fluoroscopic and interventional procedures.
    Khodadadegan Y; Zhang M; Pavlicek W; Paden RG; Chong B; Schueler BA; Fetterly KA; Langer SG; Wu T
    J Digit Imaging; 2011 Aug; 24(4):626-39. PubMed ID: 20706859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Multicenter Survey on Radiation Dose of Cardiac Intervention].
    Hayashi T; Watanabe Y; Imazeki M; Takeda K; Sakiyama K; Hasegawa R; Tajima O; Tsukamoto A; Sato H; Shiraki H; Abe O
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2020; 76(7):715-724. PubMed ID: 32684564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exposure rates during special procedures with C-arm type fluoroscopic systems.
    Glaze S; Wagner LK; Archer BR; Bushong SC
    Radiology; 1994 Jun; 191(3):849-52. PubMed ID: 8184077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of reference air kerma alert levels for pediatric fluoroscopic examinations.
    Somasundaram E; Brady SL; Strauss KJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 23(9):e13721. PubMed ID: 35925012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient Radiation Dose Reduction during Transarterial Chemoembolization Using a Novel X-Ray Imaging Platform.
    Kohlbrenner R; Kolli KP; Taylor AG; Kohi MP; Fidelman N; LaBerge JM; Kerlan RK; Agarwal VK; Lehrman ED; Nanavati S; Avrin DE; Gould R
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1331-8. PubMed ID: 26212556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation and estimation of entrance skin dose in patients during diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures].
    Iida H; Horii J; Chabatake M; Taka E; Shimizu M; Mizushima T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Jan; 60(1):126-35. PubMed ID: 15041915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Method of estimating patient skin dose from dose displayed on medical X-ray equipment with flat panel detector].
    Fukuda A; Koshida K; Yamaguchi I; Togashi A; Matsubara K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 May; 60(5):725-33. PubMed ID: 15213701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiation dose of interventional radiology system using a flat-panel detector.
    Chida K; Inaba Y; Saito H; Ishibashi T; Takahashi S; Kohzuki M; Zuguchi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1680-5. PubMed ID: 19933664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Multicenter Survey of the Display Air Kerma and Actual Measured Values in IVR X-ray Apparatus].
    Tanabe N; Sekiguchi H; Tsukamoto A; Ishida H; Ueno H; Kittaka D; Takura H; Fujimura K; Tajima O; Sato H; Tajima T; Hiroshima H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2019; 75(7):646-651. PubMed ID: 31327775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of Radiation Dose and Image Quality for Angiographic System with Spectral Shaping Filter].
    Ichikawa N; Matsubara K; Fukuda A
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2019; 75(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 30662028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship of beam angulation and radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Agarwal S; Parashar A; Bajaj NS; Khan I; Ahmad I; Heupler FA; Bunte M; Modi DK; Tuzcu EM; Kapadia SR
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):558-66. PubMed ID: 24746652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures: conventional fluoroscopy versus pulsed fluoroscopy.
    Chida K; Fuda K; Saito H; Takai Y; Takahashi S; Yamada S; Kohzuki M; Zuguchi M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Jan; 69(1):115-21; discussion 122. PubMed ID: 17139653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of skin dose calculation factors in interventional fluoroscopy.
    DeLorenzo MC; Goode AR
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 20(12):159-168. PubMed ID: 31568663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Multicenter Evaluation of Cine Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography Dose Rate for Various Angiography Programs: Comparison with Fluoroscopic Dose Rate].
    Takeda K; Hayashi T; Sakiyama K; Hasegawa R; Watanabe Y; Tajima O; Tsukamoto A; Sato H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(7):718-725. PubMed ID: 34305058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.