231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23413956)
1. Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro-rough surface implants: a review of literature and meta-analysis.
Srinivasan M; Vazquez L; Rieder P; Moraguez O; Bernard JP; Belser UC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):539-45. PubMed ID: 23413956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A retrospective study of the survival of smooth- and rough-surface dental implants.
Balshe AA; Assad DA; Eckert SE; Koka S; Weaver AL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1113-8. PubMed ID: 20162117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A 5-year prospective multicenter clinical trial of non-submerged dental implants with a titanium plasma-sprayed surface in 200 patients.
Cochran DL; Jackson JM; Jones AA; Jones JD; Kaiser DA; Taylor TD; Weber HP; Higginbottom FL; Richardson JR; Oates T
J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):990-9. PubMed ID: 21235337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival of short implants is improved with greater implant length, placement in the mandible compared with the maxilla, and in nonsmokers.
Carr AB
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(3 Suppl):189-91. PubMed ID: 23253845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Preliminary results of short-term follow-up after MIS screw-type implants with rough surface].
Shapira L; Shapira-Nir O
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2001 Jan; 18(1):51-5, 77. PubMed ID: 11460762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.
Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1523-39. PubMed ID: 10632528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short implants placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of follow-up.
Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M; Rangert B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Mar; 9(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 17362493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lemos CA; Ferro-Alves ML; Okamoto R; Mendonça MR; Pellizzer EP
J Dent; 2016 Apr; 47():8-17. PubMed ID: 26804969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Failure rates of short (≤ 10 mm) dental implants and factors influencing their failure: a systematic review.
Sun HL; Huang C; Wu YR; Shi B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):816-25. PubMed ID: 21841992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retrospective cohort study of 4591 Straumann implants in private practice setting, with up to 10-year follow-up. Part 1: multivariate survival analysis.
French D; Larjava H; Ofec R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1345-54. PubMed ID: 25134415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short implants: a descriptive study of 273 implants.
Sánchez-Garcés MA; Costa-Berenguer X; Gay-Escoda C
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):508-16. PubMed ID: 20977605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Immediate occlusal loading of NanoTite PREVAIL implants: a prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study.
Ostman PO; Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 20148916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical field trial examining an implant with a sand-blasted, acid-etched surface.
Cochran D; Oates T; Morton D; Jones A; Buser D; Peters F
J Periodontol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):974-82. PubMed ID: 17539708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A targeted review of study outcomes with short (< or = 7 mm) endosseous dental implants placed in partially edentulous patients.
Hagi D; Deporter DA; Pilliar RM; Arenovich T
J Periodontol; 2004 Jun; 75(6):798-804. PubMed ID: 15295944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are short dental implants (<10 mm) effective? a meta-analysis on prospective clinical trials.
Monje A; Chan HL; Fu JH; Suarez F; Galindo-Moreno P; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2013 Jul; 84(7):895-904. PubMed ID: 22917114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preliminary data of a prospective clinical study on the Osseotite NT implant: 18-month follow-up.
Davarpanah M; Caraman M; Szmukler-Moncler S; Jakubowicz-Kohen B; Alcolforado G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 15973957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: a meta-analysis of observational studies.
Pommer B; Frantal S; Willer J; Posch M; Watzek G; Tepper G
J Clin Periodontol; 2011 Sep; 38(9):856-63. PubMed ID: 21722154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective multicenter clinical trial of 3i machined-surface implants: results after 6 years of follow-up.
Weng D; Jacobson Z; Tarnow D; Hürzeler MB; Faehn O; Sanavi F; Barkvoll P; Stach RM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 12814318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy and predictability of short dental implants (<8 mm): a critical appraisal of the recent literature.
Srinivasan M; Vazquez L; Rieder P; Moraguez O; Bernard JP; Belser UC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1429-37. PubMed ID: 23189293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Osseotite implant: four-year interim report.
Testori T; Wiseman L; Woolfe S; Porter SS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 11324207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
