These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23413956)

  • 1. Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro-rough surface implants: a review of literature and meta-analysis.
    Srinivasan M; Vazquez L; Rieder P; Moraguez O; Bernard JP; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):539-45. PubMed ID: 23413956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A retrospective study of the survival of smooth- and rough-surface dental implants.
    Balshe AA; Assad DA; Eckert SE; Koka S; Weaver AL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1113-8. PubMed ID: 20162117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A 5-year prospective multicenter clinical trial of non-submerged dental implants with a titanium plasma-sprayed surface in 200 patients.
    Cochran DL; Jackson JM; Jones AA; Jones JD; Kaiser DA; Taylor TD; Weber HP; Higginbottom FL; Richardson JR; Oates T
    J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):990-9. PubMed ID: 21235337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survival of short implants is improved with greater implant length, placement in the mandible compared with the maxilla, and in nonsmokers.
    Carr AB
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(3 Suppl):189-91. PubMed ID: 23253845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Preliminary results of short-term follow-up after MIS screw-type implants with rough surface].
    Shapira L; Shapira-Nir O
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2001 Jan; 18(1):51-5, 77. PubMed ID: 11460762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.
    Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1523-39. PubMed ID: 10632528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short implants placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of follow-up.
    Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M; Rangert B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Mar; 9(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 17362493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lemos CA; Ferro-Alves ML; Okamoto R; Mendonça MR; Pellizzer EP
    J Dent; 2016 Apr; 47():8-17. PubMed ID: 26804969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Failure rates of short (≤ 10 mm) dental implants and factors influencing their failure: a systematic review.
    Sun HL; Huang C; Wu YR; Shi B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):816-25. PubMed ID: 21841992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrospective cohort study of 4591 Straumann implants in private practice setting, with up to 10-year follow-up. Part 1: multivariate survival analysis.
    French D; Larjava H; Ofec R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1345-54. PubMed ID: 25134415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short implants: a descriptive study of 273 implants.
    Sánchez-Garcés MA; Costa-Berenguer X; Gay-Escoda C
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):508-16. PubMed ID: 20977605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Immediate occlusal loading of NanoTite PREVAIL implants: a prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study.
    Ostman PO; Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 20148916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical field trial examining an implant with a sand-blasted, acid-etched surface.
    Cochran D; Oates T; Morton D; Jones A; Buser D; Peters F
    J Periodontol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):974-82. PubMed ID: 17539708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A targeted review of study outcomes with short (< or = 7 mm) endosseous dental implants placed in partially edentulous patients.
    Hagi D; Deporter DA; Pilliar RM; Arenovich T
    J Periodontol; 2004 Jun; 75(6):798-804. PubMed ID: 15295944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are short dental implants (<10 mm) effective? a meta-analysis on prospective clinical trials.
    Monje A; Chan HL; Fu JH; Suarez F; Galindo-Moreno P; Wang HL
    J Periodontol; 2013 Jul; 84(7):895-904. PubMed ID: 22917114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preliminary data of a prospective clinical study on the Osseotite NT implant: 18-month follow-up.
    Davarpanah M; Caraman M; Szmukler-Moncler S; Jakubowicz-Kohen B; Alcolforado G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 15973957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: a meta-analysis of observational studies.
    Pommer B; Frantal S; Willer J; Posch M; Watzek G; Tepper G
    J Clin Periodontol; 2011 Sep; 38(9):856-63. PubMed ID: 21722154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective multicenter clinical trial of 3i machined-surface implants: results after 6 years of follow-up.
    Weng D; Jacobson Z; Tarnow D; Hürzeler MB; Faehn O; Sanavi F; Barkvoll P; Stach RM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 12814318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy and predictability of short dental implants (<8 mm): a critical appraisal of the recent literature.
    Srinivasan M; Vazquez L; Rieder P; Moraguez O; Bernard JP; Belser UC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1429-37. PubMed ID: 23189293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Osseotite implant: four-year interim report.
    Testori T; Wiseman L; Woolfe S; Porter SS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 11324207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.