136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2341442)
1. Femoral stem fixation in hip replacement. A biomechanical comparison of cementless and cemented prostheses.
Phillips TW; Messieh SS; McDonald PD
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1990 May; 72(3):431-4. PubMed ID: 2341442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Loosening of cementless femoral stems: a biomechanical analysis of immediate fixation with loading vertical, femur horizontal.
Phillips TW; Nguyen LT; Munro SD
J Biomech; 1991; 24(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 2026632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is Cemented or Cementless Femoral Stem Fixation More Durable in Patients Older Than 75 Years of Age? A Comparison of the Best-performing Stems.
Tanzer M; Graves SE; Peng A; Shimmin AJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jul; 476(7):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 29683803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro stability of cemented and cementless femoral stems with compaction.
Chareancholvanich K; Bourgeault CA; Schmidt AH; Gustilo RB; Lew WD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Jan; (394):290-302. PubMed ID: 11795746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of femoral neck length, stem size, and body weight on strains in the proximal cement mantle.
Harrington MA; O'Connor DO; Lozynsky AJ; Kovach I; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Apr; 84(4):573-9. PubMed ID: 11940617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].
Kubinec V
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 30257769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial stability of a new hybrid fixation hip stem: experimental measurement of implant-bone micromotion under torsional load in comparison with cemented and cementless stems.
Baleani M; Cristofolini L; Toni A
J Biomed Mater Res; 2000 Jun; 50(4):605-15. PubMed ID: 10756320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo implant fixation of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK hip prostheses in an ovine model.
Nakahara I; Takao M; Bandoh S; Bertollo N; Walsh WR; Sugano N
J Orthop Res; 2013 Mar; 31(3):485-92. PubMed ID: 23097319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Micromotions in the primary fixation of cementless femoral stem prostheses.
Gebauer D; Refior HJ; Haake M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1989; 108(5):300-7. PubMed ID: 2783022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years.
Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A quantitative analysis of bone support comparing cementless tapered and distal fixation total hip replacements.
Howard JL; Hui AJ; Bourne RB; McCalden RW; MacDonald SJ; Rorabeck CH
J Arthroplasty; 2004 Apr; 19(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 15067636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel locking screw hip stem to achieve immediate stability in total hip arthroplasty: A biomechanical study.
Grechenig S; Gueorguiev B; Berner A; Heiss P; Müller M; Nerlich M; Schmitz P
Injury; 2015 Oct; 46 Suppl 4():S83-7. PubMed ID: 26542871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Micromotion of cemented and uncemented femoral components.
Burke DW; O'Connor DO; Zalenski EB; Jasty M; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1991 Jan; 73(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 1991771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture load for periprosthetic femoral fractures in cemented versus uncemented hip stems: an experimental in vitro study.
Thomsen MN; Jakubowitz E; Seeger JB; Lee C; Kretzer JP; Clarius M
Orthopedics; 2008 Jul; 31(7):653. PubMed ID: 19292385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrashort versus Conventional Anatomic Cementless Femoral Stems in the Same Patients Younger Than 55 Years.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Sep; 474(9):2008-17. PubMed ID: 27260482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Initial stability of fully and partially cemented femoral stems.
Claes L; Fiedler S; Ohnmacht M; Duda GN
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2000 Dec; 15(10):750-5. PubMed ID: 11050357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early Migration Predicts Aseptic Loosening of Cementless Femoral Stems: A Long-term Study.
Streit MR; Haeussler D; Bruckner T; Proctor T; Innmann MM; Merle C; Gotterbarm T; Weiss S
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jul; 474(7):1697-706. PubMed ID: 27130649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cemented versus cementless revision femoral stems using morselized allograft--a prospective, randomized study with 5 years follow-up].
Nesse E; Nielsen EW; Bastian D
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(6):678-83. PubMed ID: 14679434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deformation pattern and load transfer of an uncemented femoral stem with modular necks. An experimental study in human cadaver femurs.
Enoksen CH; Gjerdet NR; Klaksvik J; Arthursson AJ; Schnell-Husby O; Wik TS
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():28-33. PubMed ID: 26785385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
