These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2341442)
1. Femoral stem fixation in hip replacement. A biomechanical comparison of cementless and cemented prostheses. Phillips TW; Messieh SS; McDonald PD J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1990 May; 72(3):431-4. PubMed ID: 2341442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Loosening of cementless femoral stems: a biomechanical analysis of immediate fixation with loading vertical, femur horizontal. Phillips TW; Nguyen LT; Munro SD J Biomech; 1991; 24(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 2026632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is Cemented or Cementless Femoral Stem Fixation More Durable in Patients Older Than 75 Years of Age? A Comparison of the Best-performing Stems. Tanzer M; Graves SE; Peng A; Shimmin AJ Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jul; 476(7):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 29683803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro stability of cemented and cementless femoral stems with compaction. Chareancholvanich K; Bourgeault CA; Schmidt AH; Gustilo RB; Lew WD Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Jan; (394):290-302. PubMed ID: 11795746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of femoral neck length, stem size, and body weight on strains in the proximal cement mantle. Harrington MA; O'Connor DO; Lozynsky AJ; Kovach I; Harris WH J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Apr; 84(4):573-9. PubMed ID: 11940617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement]. Kubinec V Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 30257769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial stability of a new hybrid fixation hip stem: experimental measurement of implant-bone micromotion under torsional load in comparison with cemented and cementless stems. Baleani M; Cristofolini L; Toni A J Biomed Mater Res; 2000 Jun; 50(4):605-15. PubMed ID: 10756320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo implant fixation of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK hip prostheses in an ovine model. Nakahara I; Takao M; Bandoh S; Bertollo N; Walsh WR; Sugano N J Orthop Res; 2013 Mar; 31(3):485-92. PubMed ID: 23097319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Micromotions in the primary fixation of cementless femoral stem prostheses. Gebauer D; Refior HJ; Haake M Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1989; 108(5):300-7. PubMed ID: 2783022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years. Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A quantitative analysis of bone support comparing cementless tapered and distal fixation total hip replacements. Howard JL; Hui AJ; Bourne RB; McCalden RW; MacDonald SJ; Rorabeck CH J Arthroplasty; 2004 Apr; 19(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 15067636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel locking screw hip stem to achieve immediate stability in total hip arthroplasty: A biomechanical study. Grechenig S; Gueorguiev B; Berner A; Heiss P; Müller M; Nerlich M; Schmitz P Injury; 2015 Oct; 46 Suppl 4():S83-7. PubMed ID: 26542871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Micromotion of cemented and uncemented femoral components. Burke DW; O'Connor DO; Zalenski EB; Jasty M; Harris WH J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1991 Jan; 73(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 1991771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component? Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture load for periprosthetic femoral fractures in cemented versus uncemented hip stems: an experimental in vitro study. Thomsen MN; Jakubowitz E; Seeger JB; Lee C; Kretzer JP; Clarius M Orthopedics; 2008 Jul; 31(7):653. PubMed ID: 19292385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrashort versus Conventional Anatomic Cementless Femoral Stems in the Same Patients Younger Than 55 Years. Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Sep; 474(9):2008-17. PubMed ID: 27260482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Initial stability of fully and partially cemented femoral stems. Claes L; Fiedler S; Ohnmacht M; Duda GN Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2000 Dec; 15(10):750-5. PubMed ID: 11050357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cemented versus cementless revision femoral stems using morselized allograft--a prospective, randomized study with 5 years follow-up]. Nesse E; Nielsen EW; Bastian D Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(6):678-83. PubMed ID: 14679434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deformation pattern and load transfer of an uncemented femoral stem with modular necks. An experimental study in human cadaver femurs. Enoksen CH; Gjerdet NR; Klaksvik J; Arthursson AJ; Schnell-Husby O; Wik TS Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2016 Feb; 32():28-33. PubMed ID: 26785385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]