These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23414963)

  • 1. Validity of palpation techniques for the identification of the spinous process L5.
    Merz O; Wolf U; Robert M; Gesing V; Rominger M
    Man Ther; 2013 Aug; 18(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 23414963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interexaminer reliability and accuracy of posterior superior iliac spine and iliac crest palpation for spinal level estimations.
    Kim HW; Ko YJ; Rhee WI; Lee JS; Lim JE; Lee SJ; Im S; Lee JI
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2007 Jun; 30(5):386-9. PubMed ID: 17574957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Manual palpation of lumbo-pelvic landmarks: a validity study.
    Kilby J; Heneghan NR; Maybury M
    Man Ther; 2012 Jun; 17(3):259-62. PubMed ID: 21945296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Palpation identification of spinous processes in the lumbar spine.
    Harlick JC; Milosavljevic S; Milburn PD
    Man Ther; 2007 Feb; 12(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 16781182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of pMRI to validate the identification of palpated bony landmarks.
    Cooper K; Alexander L; Hancock E; Smith FW
    Man Ther; 2013 Aug; 18(4):289-93. PubMed ID: 23134685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and validity of a palpation technique for identifying the spinous processes of C7 and L5.
    Robinson R; Robinson HS; Bjørke G; Kvale A
    Man Ther; 2009 Aug; 14(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 18793865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing the anatomical consistency of the posterior superior iliac spine to the iliac crest as reference landmarks for the lumbopelvic spine: a retrospective radiological study.
    McGaugh JM; Brismée JM; Dedrick GS; Jones EA; Sizer PS
    Clin Anat; 2007 Oct; 20(7):819-25. PubMed ID: 17729332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Which spinal levels are identified by palpation of the iliac crests and the posterior superior iliac spines?
    Chakraverty R; Pynsent P; Isaacs K
    J Anat; 2007 Feb; 210(2):232-6. PubMed ID: 17261142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abdominal circumference but not the degree of lumbar flexion affects the accuracy of lumbar interspace identification by Tuffier's line palpation method: an observational study.
    Lin N; Li Y; Bebawy JF; Dong J; Hua L
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2015; 15():9. PubMed ID: 25670920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of the correct lumbar level using passive intersegmental motion testing.
    Chakraverty RC; Pynsent PB; Westwood A; Chakraverty JK
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Nov; 62(11):1121-5. PubMed ID: 17924892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lumbar spine segmental mobility assessment: an examination of validity for determining intervention strategies in patients with low back pain.
    Fritz JM; Whitman JM; Childs JD
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 86(9):1745-52. PubMed ID: 16181937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simple anatomical information improves the accuracy of locating specific spinous processes during manual examination of the low back.
    Phillips DR; Barnard S; Mullee MA; Hurley MV
    Man Ther; 2009 Jun; 14(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 18511330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Static palpation ain't easy: Evaluating palpation precision using a topographical map of the lumbar spine as a reference.
    Hvidkær IS; Harsted S; Hadizadeh M; O'Neill S; Kawchuk GN; Nim C
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0304571. PubMed ID: 38814967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of single and composites of selected motion palpation and pain provocation tests for sacroiliac joint.
    Arab AM; Abdollahi I; Joghataei MT; Golafshani Z; Kazemnejad A
    Man Ther; 2009 Apr; 14(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 18373938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Palpatory accuracy of lumbar spinous processes using multiple bony landmarks.
    Snider KT; Snider EJ; Degenhardt BF; Johnson JC; Kribs JW
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2011 Jun; 34(5):306-13. PubMed ID: 21640254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of posteroanterior spinal stiffness measures to clinical and demographic findings at baseline in patients enrolled in a clinical study of spinal manipulation for low back pain.
    Owens EF; DeVocht JW; Gudavalli MR; Wilder DG; Meeker WC
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2007 Sep; 30(7):493-500. PubMed ID: 17870417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between spinal stiffness and outcome in patients with chronic low back pain.
    Ferreira ML; Ferreira PH; Latimer J; Herbert RD; Maher C; Refshauge K
    Man Ther; 2009 Feb; 14(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18164644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of the correct cervical level by palpation of spinous processes.
    Shin S; Yoon DM; Yoon KB
    Anesth Analg; 2011 May; 112(5):1232-5. PubMed ID: 21346160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Novel and Accurate Palpation Method for Identification of the L4 Spinous Process: A Preliminary Study of Accuracy.
    Roytman GR; Selby S; Cantu J; Cramer GD
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2021 Jun; 44(5):398-407. PubMed ID: 34429213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short-term effects of Mulligan mobilization with movement on pain, disability, and kinematic spinal movements in patients with nonspecific low back pain: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.
    Hidalgo B; Pitance L; Hall T; Detrembleur C; Nielens H
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2015; 38(6):365-74. PubMed ID: 26215900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.