These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23415361)

  • 1. US nulliparas' perceptions of roles and of the birth experience as predictors of their delivery preferences.
    Arcia A
    Midwifery; 2013 Aug; 29(8):885-94. PubMed ID: 23415361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chilean women's preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why?
    Angeja AC; Washington AE; Vargas JE; Gomez R; Rojas I; Caughey AB
    BJOG; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1253-8. PubMed ID: 17014679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preferred place of birth: characteristics and motives of low-risk nulliparous women in the Netherlands.
    van Haaren-Ten Haken T; Hendrix M; Nieuwenhuijze M; Budé L; de Vries R; Nijhuis J
    Midwifery; 2012 Oct; 28(5):609-18. PubMed ID: 22921160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Behind the myth--few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors.
    Karlström A; Nystedt A; Johansson M; Hildingsson I
    Midwifery; 2011 Oct; 27(5):620-7. PubMed ID: 20630634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why do some pregnant women prefer cesarean? The influence of parity, delivery experiences, and fear.
    Fuglenes D; Aas E; Botten G; Øian P; Kristiansen IS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 205(1):45.e1-9. PubMed ID: 21620366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why do women request caesarean section in a normal, healthy first pregnancy?
    Fenwick J; Staff L; Gamble J; Creedy DK; Bayes S
    Midwifery; 2010 Aug; 26(4):394-400. PubMed ID: 19117644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Caesarean section at maternal request--the differing views of patients and healthcare professionals: a questionnaire based study.
    Sharpe AN; Waring GJ; Rees J; McGarry K; Hinshaw K
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Sep; 192():54-60. PubMed ID: 26151240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The experience of pregnancy and birth with midwives: results from the Canadian maternity experiences survey.
    O'Brien B; Chalmers B; Fell D; Heaman M; Darling EK; Herbert P
    Birth; 2011 Sep; 38(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 21884229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between women-centred care and women's birth experiences: a comparison between birth centres, clinics, and hospitals in Japan.
    Iida M; Horiuchi S; Porter SE
    Midwifery; 2012 Aug; 28(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 21835515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Home or hospital? Midwife or physician? Preferences for maternity care provider and place of birth among Western Australian students.
    Stoll KH; Hauck YL; Hall WA
    Women Birth; 2016 Feb; 29(1):e33-8. PubMed ID: 26319505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of childbirth expectations on Western Australian women's perceptions of their birth experience.
    Hauck Y; Fenwick J; Downie J; Butt J
    Midwifery; 2007 Sep; 23(3):235-47. PubMed ID: 17097202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care: labour and birth outcomes.
    Benjamin Y; Walsh D; Taub N
    Midwifery; 2001 Sep; 17(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 11502143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Caesarean delivery or vaginal birth: preference of Turkish pregnant women and influencing factors.
    Buyukbayrak EE; Kaymaz O; Kars B; Karsidag AY; Bektas E; Unal O; Turan C
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Feb; 30(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 20143975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.
    Kataoka Y; Eto H; Iida M
    Midwifery; 2013 Aug; 29(8):965-72. PubMed ID: 23415360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Choice and birth method: mixed-method study of caesarean delivery for maternal request.
    Kingdon C; Neilson J; Singleton V; Gyte G; Hart A; Gabbay M; Lavender T
    BJOG; 2009 Jun; 116(7):886-95. PubMed ID: 19385961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mode of delivery preferences in a diverse population of pregnant women.
    Yee LM; Kaimal AJ; Houston KA; Wu E; Thiet MP; Nakagawa S; Caughey AB; Firouzian A; Kuppermann M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 212(3):377.e1-24. PubMed ID: 25446662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The novice birthing: theorising first-time mothers' experiences of birth at home and in hospital in Australia.
    Dahlen HG; Barclay LM; Homer CS
    Midwifery; 2010 Feb; 26(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 18394766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Women's experience of decision making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: the role of health professionals and information about health risks.
    Emmett CL; Shaw AR; Montgomery AA; Murphy DJ;
    BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1438-45. PubMed ID: 17081180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A study on preference and practices of women regarding place of delivery.
    Mahdi SS; Habib OS
    East Mediterr Health J; 2010 Aug; 16(8):874-8. PubMed ID: 21469570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Apgar score of 0 at 5 minutes and neonatal seizures or serious neurologic dysfunction in relation to birth setting.
    Grünebaum A; McCullough LB; Sapra KJ; Brent RL; Levene MI; Arabin B; Chervenak FA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 209(4):323.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23791692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.