BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23415524)

  • 1. Serum protein removal from skim milk with a 3-stage, 3× ceramic Isoflux membrane process at 50°C.
    Adams MC; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Apr; 96(4):2020-2034. PubMed ID: 23415524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficiency of serum protein removal from skim milk with ceramic and polymeric membranes at 50 degrees C.
    Zulewska J; Newbold M; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Apr; 92(4):1361-77. PubMed ID: 19307617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of casein on flux and passage of serum proteins during microfiltration using polymeric spiral-wound membranes at 50°C.
    Zulewska J; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Apr; 96(4):2048-2060. PubMed ID: 23415517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Production efficiency of micellar casein concentrate using polymeric spiral-wound microfiltration membranes.
    Beckman SL; Zulewska J; Newbold M; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Oct; 93(10):4506-17. PubMed ID: 20854984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of microfiltration concentration factor on serum protein removal from skim milk using spiral-wound polymeric membranes.
    Beckman SL; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Oct; 96(10):6199-212. PubMed ID: 23891300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of linear velocity and flux on performance of ceramic graded permeability membranes when processing skim milk at 50°C.
    Zulewska J; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 May; 97(5):2619-32. PubMed ID: 24612815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Micellar casein concentrate production with a 3X, 3-stage, uniform transmembrane pressure ceramic membrane process at 50°C.
    Hurt E; Zulewska J; Newbold M; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Dec; 93(12):5588-600. PubMed ID: 21094730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A process efficiency assessment of serum protein removal from milk using ceramic graded permeability microfiltration membrane.
    Tremblay-Marchand D; Doyen A; Britten M; Pouliot Y
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Jul; 99(7):5230-5243. PubMed ID: 27132105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microfiltration of skim milk and modified skim milk using a 0.1-µm ceramic uniform transmembrane pressure system at temperatures of 50, 55, 60, and 65°C.
    Hurt EE; Adams MC; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Feb; 98(2):765-80. PubMed ID: 25497798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of ceramic membrane channel geometry and uniform transmembrane pressure on limiting flux and serum protein removal during skim milk microfiltration.
    Adams MC; Hurt EE; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Nov; 98(11):7527-43. PubMed ID: 26298765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Process efficiency of casein separation from milk using polymeric spiral-wound microfiltration membranes.
    Mercier-Bouchard D; Benoit S; Doyen A; Britten M; Pouliot Y
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Nov; 100(11):8838-8848. PubMed ID: 28843690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimization of protein fractionation by skim milk microfiltration: Choice of ceramic membrane pore size and filtration temperature.
    Jørgensen CE; Abrahamsen RK; Rukke EO; Johansen AG; Schüller RB; Skeie SB
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Aug; 99(8):6164-6179. PubMed ID: 27265169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of ceramic membrane channel diameter on limiting retentate protein concentration during skim milk microfiltration.
    Adams MC; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Jan; 99(1):167-82. PubMed ID: 26519975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficiency of removal of whey protein from sweet whey using polymeric microfiltration membranes.
    Carter B; DiMarzo L; Pranata J; Barbano DM; Drake M
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Aug; 104(8):8630-8643. PubMed ID: 34099299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A microfiltration process to maximize removal of serum proteins from skim milk before cheese making.
    Nelson BK; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 May; 88(5):1891-900. PubMed ID: 15829684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Processing factors that influence casein and serum protein separation by microfiltration.
    Hurt E; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Oct; 93(10):4928-41. PubMed ID: 20855027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of soluble calcium and lactose on limiting flux and serum protein removal during skim milk microfiltration.
    Adams MC; Hurt EE; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Nov; 98(11):7483-97. PubMed ID: 26298759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficient removal of spores from skim milk using cold microfiltration: Spore size and surface property considerations.
    Griep ER; Cheng Y; Moraru CI
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Nov; 101(11):9703-9713. PubMed ID: 30146287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A physicochemical investigation of membrane fouling in cold microfiltration of skim milk.
    Tan TJ; Wang D; Moraru CI
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(8):4759-71. PubMed ID: 24881794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microfiltration: Effect of channel diameter on limiting flux and serum protein removal.
    Hurt EE; Adams MC; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jun; 98(6):3599-612. PubMed ID: 25892692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.