85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23415623)
1. Applying the Transtheoretical Model to evaluate the effect of a call-recall program in enhancing Pap smear practice: a cluster randomized trial.
Abdullah F; Su TT
Prev Med; 2013; 57 Suppl():S83-6. PubMed ID: 23415623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a worksite cervical screening initiative to increase Pap smear uptake in Malaysia: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
Abdullah F; O'Rorke M; Murray L; Su TT
Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():572126. PubMed ID: 24073411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Study protocol for the most effective recall method in a cervical cancer screening program in Klang, Malaysia.
Abdul Rashid RM; Dahlui M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(10):5867-70. PubMed ID: 24289591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost effective analysis of recall methods for cervical cancer screening in Selangor--results from a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Rashid RM; Ramli S; John J; Dahlui M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(13):5143-7. PubMed ID: 25040965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is the phone call the most effective method for recall in cervical cancer screening?--results from a randomised control trial.
Abdul Rashid RM; Mohamed M; Hamid ZA; Dahlui M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(10):5901-4. PubMed ID: 24289597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
Buehler SK; Parsons WL
CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 9294390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlates between risk perceptions of cervical cancer and screening practice.
Wong YL; Chinna K; Mariapun J; Wong LP; Khoo EM; Low WY; Shuib R
Prev Med; 2013; 57 Suppl():S24-6. PubMed ID: 23318158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A primary healthcare-based intervention to improve a Danish cervical cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
Jensen H; Svanholm H; Støvring H; Bro F
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2009 Jul; 63(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 19228681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors related to poor practice of Pap smear screening among secondary school teachers in Malaysia.
Abdullah F; Aziz NA; Su TT
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(5):1347-52. PubMed ID: 21875295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Effects of Theory-Based Educational Intervention and WhatsApp Follow-up on Papanicolaou Smear Uptake Among Postnatal Women in Malaysia: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Mohammad Z; Ahmad N; Baharom A
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2022 Jun; 10(6):e32089. PubMed ID: 35759319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative effectiveness of two outreach strategies for cervical cancer screening.
Bowles EJ; Gao H; Brandzel S; Bradford SC; Buist DS
Prev Med; 2016 May; 86():19-27. PubMed ID: 26820221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical cancer screening: a prospective cohort study of the effects of historical patient compliance and a population-based informatics prompted reminder on screening rates.
MacLaughlin KL; Swanson KM; Naessens JM; Angstman KB; Chaudhry R
J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Apr; 20(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 24237657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How reminders given to patients and physicians affected pap smear use in a health maintenance organization: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Burack RC; Gimotty PA; George J; McBride S; Moncrease A; Simon MS; Dews P; Coombs J
Cancer; 1998 Jun; 82(12):2391-400. PubMed ID: 9635532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of a Health Education Program to Improve Knowledge and Attitude Towards Cervical Cancer and Pap Smear: A Controlled Community Trial in Malaysia.
Romli R; Shahabudin S; Saddki N; Mokhtar N
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 Mar; 21(3):853-859. PubMed ID: 32212817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of health education on the knowledge, attitude, and uptake of free Pap smear among female teachers in Birnin-Kebbi, North-Western Nigeria.
Adamu AN; Abiola AO; Ibrahim M
Niger J Clin Pract; 2012; 15(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 22960970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening in Spanish women with diabetes: associated factors and trend between 2006 and 2010.
Martinez-Huedo MA; Lopez de Andres A; Hernandez-Barrera V; Carrasco-Garrido P; Martinez Hernandez D; Jiménez-Garcia R
Diabetes Metab; 2012 Apr; 38(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 22078638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical screening in general practice.
Pritchard DA; Straton JA; Hyndman J
Aust J Public Health; 1995 Apr; 19(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 7786943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer and screening among Malaysian women who have never had a Pap smear: a qualitative study.
Wong LP; Wong YL; Low WY; Khoo EM; Shuib R
Singapore Med J; 2009 Jan; 50(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 19224084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of invitation and reminder letters on cervical cancer screening participation rates in an organized screening program.
Tavasoli SM; Pefoyo AJ; Hader J; Lee A; Kupets R
Prev Med; 2016 Jul; 88():230-6. PubMed ID: 27143497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
