228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23416667)
41. Biomedical research. Stimulus funding elicits a tidal wave of 'challenge grants'.
Kaiser J
Science; 2009 May; 324(5929):867. PubMed ID: 19443754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Russian scientists. Small, quick grants proposed as lifeline.
Mervis J
Nature; 1992 Mar; 356(6366):182-3. PubMed ID: 1552931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. What do Public Health Service agencies do with grant proposals?
Willette RE
Am J Pharm Educ; 1977 Nov; 41(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 10313840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. National Institutes of Health. Panel weighs starter R01 grants.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Jun; 304(5679):1891. PubMed ID: 15218117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. National Institutes of Health implements electronic grant submission.
J Investig Med; 2007 Jan; 55(1):9. PubMed ID: 17443943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Touting prevention, Clinton budget seeks increases for family planning.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1994 Feb; (4):1-2. PubMed ID: 12345595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Venter backs call for more public funds.
Wadman M
Nature; 1998 May; 393(6683):296. PubMed ID: 9620787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Where have traditional competing RO1 grants gone?
Broder S; Hartinger J
Cancer Res; 1990 Jun; 50(12):3470-2. PubMed ID: 2340498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. A national policy for biomedical and behavioral research: position of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
Berne R; Cooper T; Skinner D; Sanders C; Whybrow PC; Halvorson H; Dodge PR; Thier SO; Morgan TE; Dolan KS
Clin Res; 1979 Feb; 27(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 10241606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. National Institute on Aging seed funding enables Alzheimer's disease startups to reach key value inflection points.
Ghazarian AL; Haim T; Sauma S; Katiyar P
Alzheimers Dement; 2022 Feb; 18(2):348-359. PubMed ID: 34374496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. How is a conservative US administration influencing NCI funding?
Tew KD
Biomed Pharmacother; 2006 Nov; 60(9):500-1. PubMed ID: 17045450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Research for hire.
Serafini MW
Natl J (Wash); 1996 Mar; 28(13):704-8. PubMed ID: 10155831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Advancing Targeted Radionuclide Therapy Through the National Cancer Institute's Small Business Innovation Research Pathway.
Zakeri K; Narayanan D; Evans G; Prasanna P; Buchsbaum JC; Vikram B; Capala J
J Nucl Med; 2019 Jan; 60(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 30030338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Funding of human embryo research in the US.
Thomson J
Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Apr; 17(4):312. PubMed ID: 10207858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Product development: case studies. A new dimension.
Health Serv J; 2012 Apr; 122(6303):Suppl 28-9. PubMed ID: 22741366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. NIH proposes new conflict-of-interest rules for investigators.
Goozner M
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Jul; 102(14):1006-7. PubMed ID: 20616352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Reduced grants set off short fuses among US scientists.
Ready T
Nat Med; 2005 Jun; 11(6):582. PubMed ID: 15937454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Grants: fuel that feeds research.
Lawrence SV
Bull Am Coll Physicians; 1978 Jan; 19(1):18-22, 24-6. PubMed ID: 10236122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Industry and academia in transition.
Kennedy D
Science; 2003 Nov; 302(5649):1293. PubMed ID: 14631000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system.
Hegde D; Mowery DC
Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1797-8. PubMed ID: 19095928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
