These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2341667)

  • 1. Effect of contralateral sound stimulation on the distortion product 2F1-F2: evidence that the medial efferent system is involved.
    Puel JL; Rebillard G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1630-5. PubMed ID: 2341667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE?
    Moulin A; Collet L; Morgon A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 1604981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Increased amplitude of distortion product emissions in the human caused by contralateral low intensity acoustic stimulation].
    Nieschalk M; Beneking R; Stoll W
    HNO; 1997 May; 45(5):378-84. PubMed ID: 9265021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variations of cochlear microphonic potential after sectioning efferent fibers to the cochlea.
    Bonfils P; Remond MC; Pujol R
    Hear Res; 1987; 30(2-3):267-71. PubMed ID: 3680069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of olivocochlear bundle transection on tuning curves and acoustic distortion products.
    Littman TA; Cullen JK; Bobbin RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):1945-52. PubMed ID: 1401539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Effect of contralateral noise exposure on otoacoustic distortion product emissions in man].
    Richter B; Hauser R; Löhle E
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Mar; 74(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 7755853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid assessment of sound-evoked olivocochlear feedback: suppression of compound action potentials by contralateral sound.
    Liberman MC
    Hear Res; 1989 Mar; 38(1-2):47-56. PubMed ID: 2708159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contralateral noise has possible asymmetric frequency-sensitive effect on the 2F1-F2 otoacoustic emission in humans.
    Atcherson SR; Martin MJ; Lintvedt R
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jun; 438(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 18472335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics.
    Mountain DC
    Science; 1980 Oct; 210(4465):71-2. PubMed ID: 7414321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear nonlinearities inferred from two-tone distortion products in the ear canal of the alligator lizard.
    Rosowski JJ; Peake WT; White JR
    Hear Res; 1984 Feb; 13(2):141-58. PubMed ID: 6715262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medial olivocochlear efferent activity in awake guinea pigs.
    Guitton MJ; Avan P; Puel JL; Bonfils P
    Neuroreport; 2004 Jun; 15(9):1379-82. PubMed ID: 15194856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Signal processing in the auditory system and how it may relate to binaural hearing.
    Møller AR
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():65-79. PubMed ID: 6955928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus on 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in anesthetized guinea pigs.
    Popelar J; Mazelová J; Syka J
    Hear Res; 2002 Aug; 170(1-2):116-26. PubMed ID: 12208546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Synchronization of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions to a 2f1-f2 distortion product.
    van Dijk P; Wit HP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):850-6. PubMed ID: 2212310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Effect of contralateral stimulation on otoacoustic evoked emissions in acute deafness].
    Gunzenhäusser E; Maurer J; Beck A; Mann W
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Jun; 73(6):311-4. PubMed ID: 8060449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of centrifugal pathways on responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to signals in noise.
    Mulders WH; Seluakumaran K; Robertson D
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 27(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 18279322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Continuous low level sound alters cochlear mechanics: an efferent effect?
    Brown AM
    Hear Res; 1988 Jul; 34(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 3403383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An alternate approach to constructing distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves.
    Johnson TA; Neely ST; Dierking DM; Hoover BM; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3263-6. PubMed ID: 15658675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal structure model of binaural masking level difference.
    Albeck Y; Nebenzahl I; Lewis A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1389-93. PubMed ID: 1401525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time-varying alterations in the f2-f1 DPOAE response to continuous primary stimulation. I: Response characterization and contribution of the olivocochlear efferents.
    Kujawa SG; Fallon M; Bobbin RP
    Hear Res; 1995 May; 85(1-2):142-54. PubMed ID: 7559170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.