These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2341680)

  • 1. Phoneme discrimination using connectionist networks.
    Watrous RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1753-72. PubMed ID: 2341680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phonetic processing areas revealed by sinewave speech and acoustically similar non-speech.
    Benson RR; Richardson M; Whalen DH; Lai S
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):342-53. PubMed ID: 16530428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speaker normalization using cortical strip maps: a neural model for steady-state vowel categorization.
    Ames H; Grossberg S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3918-36. PubMed ID: 19206817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling the temporal dynamics of distinctive feature landmark detectors for speech recognition.
    Jansen A; Niyogi P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1739-58. PubMed ID: 19045664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phonetically trained models for speaker recognition.
    Rodríguez-Liñares L; Garciá-Mateo C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):385-9. PubMed ID: 11206167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Classification of stop place in consonant-vowel contexts using feature extrapolation of acoustic-phonetic features in telephone speech.
    Lee JW; Choi JY; Kang HG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1536-46. PubMed ID: 22352523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Words from spontaneous conversational speech can be recognized with human-like accuracy by an error-driven learning algorithm that discriminates between meanings straight from smart acoustic features, bypassing the phoneme as recognition unit.
    Arnold D; Tomaschek F; Sering K; Lopez F; Baayen RH
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0174623. PubMed ID: 28394938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic-phonetic features for the automatic classification of fricatives.
    Ali AM; Van der Spiegel J; Mueller P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2217-35. PubMed ID: 11386573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emotional speech acoustic model for Malay: iterative versus isolated unit training.
    Mustafa MB; Ainon RN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3057-66. PubMed ID: 24116440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic and auditory phonetics: the adaptive design of speech sound systems.
    Diehl RL
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Mar; 363(1493):965-78. PubMed ID: 17827108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speaker-independent consonant classification in continuous speech with distinctive features and neural networks.
    De Mori R; Flammia G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3091-103. PubMed ID: 8300949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Central auditory processing of peripheral vowel spectra.
    Chistovich LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Mar; 77(3):789-805. PubMed ID: 3980877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech sound representation in the brain.
    Kraus N; Cheour M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2000; 5(3-4):140-50. PubMed ID: 10859409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic richness modulates the neural networks supporting intelligible speech processing.
    Lee YS; Min NE; Wingfield A; Grossman M; Peelle JE
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():108-117. PubMed ID: 26723103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computational speech segregation based on an auditory-inspired modulation analysis.
    May T; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3350. PubMed ID: 25480079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved speech inversion using general regression neural network.
    Najnin S; Banerjee B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):EL229-35. PubMed ID: 26428818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Synchrony capture filterbank: auditory-inspired signal processing for tracking individual frequency components in speech.
    Kumaresan R; Peddinti VK; Cariani P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4290-310. PubMed ID: 23742379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A neural network model of the articulatory-acoustic forward mapping trained on recordings of articulatory parameters.
    Kello CT; Plaut DC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2354-64. PubMed ID: 15532666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pitch and voiced/unvoiced determination with an auditory model.
    Van Immerseel LM; Martens JP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3511-26. PubMed ID: 1619127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.