These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2341688)
1. Further assessment of a method to estimate reliability and validity of qualitative research findings. Hinds PS; Scandrett-Hibden S; McAulay LS J Adv Nurs; 1990 Apr; 15(4):430-5. PubMed ID: 2341688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and validity in research. Roberts P; Priest H Nurs Stand; 2006 Jul 12-18; 20(44):41-5. PubMed ID: 16872117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The strengths and weaknesses of quantitative and qualitative research: what method for nursing? Carr LT J Adv Nurs; 1994 Oct; 20(4):716-21. PubMed ID: 7822608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of qualitative research. Horsburgh D J Clin Nurs; 2003 Mar; 12(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 12603565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Understanding the error of our ways: mapping the concepts of validity and reliability. Higgins PA; Straub AJ Nurs Outlook; 2006; 54(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 16487776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In response to Porter S. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 60 (1), 79-86. Rolfe G J Adv Nurs; 2007 Oct; 60(1):108-9. PubMed ID: 17824944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Understanding and critiquing quantitative research papers. Lee P Nurs Times; 2006 Jul 11-17; 102(28):28-30. PubMed ID: 16869219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rigor in cross-cultural nursing research. Im EO; Page R; Lin LC; Tsai HM; Cheng CY Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Nov; 41(8):891-9. PubMed ID: 15476762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and validity in practice: assessment tools. Alison T; Shields L Paediatr Nurs; 2005 Nov; 17(9):43. PubMed ID: 16315818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity and reliability--What's it all about? Part 1. Validity in quantitative studies. Twycross A; Shields L Paediatr Nurs; 2004 Nov; 16(9):28. PubMed ID: 15633276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity and reliability: what do these terms mean? Maughan ED NASN Sch Nurse; 2009 May; 24(3):119-20. PubMed ID: 20437676 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Content analysis: reliability and validity. Lederman RP MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1991; 16(4):199. PubMed ID: 1943527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Why are reliability and validity important to neuroscience nurses? Buelow JM; Hinkle JL J Neurosci Nurs; 2008 Dec; 40(6):369-70, 372. PubMed ID: 19170305 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of health records in research: reliability and validity issues. Aaronson LS; Burman ME Res Nurs Health; 1994 Feb; 17(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 8134613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The development of a Weighted Objective Research Criterion Assessment Tool (WORCAT). Treadwell I Curationis; 1994 Jun; 17(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 8044878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of unreliability of measurements on statistical conclusion validity. Strickland OL J Nurs Meas; 2005; 13(2):83-5. PubMed ID: 16401039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A Substruction Approach to Assessing the Theoretical Validity of Measures. Ryan P; Weiss M; Papanek P J Nurs Meas; 2019 Apr; 27(1):126-145. PubMed ID: 31068496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A critical appraisal of the role of triangulation in nursing research. Sim J; Sharp K Int J Nurs Stud; 1998; 35(1-2):23-31. PubMed ID: 9695007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]