These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23417238)

  • 1. Comparing adaptive procedures for estimating the psychometric function for an auditory gap detection task.
    Shen Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 May; 75(4):771-80. PubMed ID: 23417238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Signal detection theory and vestibular perception: III. Estimating unbiased fit parameters for psychometric functions.
    Chaudhuri SE; Merfeld DM
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Mar; 225(1):133-46. PubMed ID: 23250442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experience with a yes-no single-interval maximum-likelihood procedure.
    Leek MR; Dubno JR; He N; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2674-84. PubMed ID: 10830389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating parameters for psychometric functions using the four-point sampling method.
    Lam CF; Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; He NJ; Mills JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Dec; 102(6):3697-703. PubMed ID: 9407661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary.
    Klein SA
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1421-55. PubMed ID: 11800466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A maximum-likelihood procedure for estimating psychometric functions: thresholds, slopes, and lapses of attention.
    Shen Y; Richards VM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):957-67. PubMed ID: 22894217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold.
    Kontsevich LL; Tyler CW
    Vision Res; 1999 Aug; 39(16):2729-37. PubMed ID: 10492833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian adaptive estimation of the auditory filter.
    Shen Y; Richards VM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1134-45. PubMed ID: 23927113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Slope bias of psychometric functions derived from adaptive data.
    Kaernbach C
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1389-98. PubMed ID: 11800464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of maximum-likelihood estimators in nonintensive auditory psychophysics.
    Saberi K; Green DM
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Aug; 59(6):867-76. PubMed ID: 9270361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tracking of nociceptive thresholds using adaptive psychophysical methods.
    Doll RJ; Buitenweg JR; Meijer HG; Veltink PH
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Mar; 46(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 23835651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Further studies of a maximum-likelihood yes-no procedure.
    Gu X; Green DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jul; 96(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 8064025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determining thresholds using adaptive procedures and psychometric fits: evaluating efficiency using theory, simulations, and human experiments.
    Karmali F; Chaudhuri SE; Yi Y; Merfeld DM
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):773-89. PubMed ID: 26645306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Principles of an adaptive method for measuring the slope of the psychometric function.
    King-Smith PE; Rose D
    Vision Res; 1997 Jun; 37(12):1595-604. PubMed ID: 9231226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive psychophysical procedures and imbalance in the psychometric function.
    Saberi K; Green DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jul; 100(1):528-36. PubMed ID: 8675846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fitting the psychometric function.
    Treutwein B; Strasburger H
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Jan; 61(1):87-106. PubMed ID: 10070202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of adaptive psychometric procedures based on the theory of optimal experiments and bayesian techniques: implications for cochlear implant testing.
    Remus JJ; Collins LM
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Apr; 69(3):311-23. PubMed ID: 17672419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An interleaved tracking procedure to monitor unstable psychometric functions.
    Leek MR; Hanna TE; Marshall L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Sep; 90(3):1385-97. PubMed ID: 1939903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Empirical validation of QUEST+ in PSE and JND estimations in visual discrimination tasks.
    Paire A; Hillairet de Boisferon A; Paeye C
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):3984-4001. PubMed ID: 36538168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toward Routine Assessments of Auditory Filter Shape.
    Shen Y; Kern AB; Richards VM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Feb; 62(2):442-455. PubMed ID: 30950687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.