205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23418073)
1. Engineered nanomaterials in water and soils: a risk quantification based on probabilistic exposure and effect modeling.
Gottschalk F; Kost E; Nowack B
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Jun; 32(6):1278-87. PubMed ID: 23418073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Probabilistic environmental risk assessment of five nanomaterials (nano-TiO2, nano-Ag, nano-ZnO, CNT, and fullerenes).
Coll C; Notter D; Gottschalk F; Sun T; Som C; Nowack B
Nanotoxicology; 2016; 10(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 26554717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Form-Specific and Probabilistic Environmental Risk Assessment of 3 Engineered Nanomaterials (Nano-Ag, Nano-TiO
Hong H; Adam V; Nowack B
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2021 Sep; 40(9):2629-2639. PubMed ID: 34171135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Possibilities and limitations of modeling environmental exposure to engineered nanomaterials by probabilistic material flow analysis.
Gottschalk F; Sonderer T; Scholz RW; Nowack B
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2010 May; 29(5):1036-48. PubMed ID: 20821538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO(2), ZnO, Ag, CNT, Fullerenes) for different regions.
Gottschalk F; Sonderer T; Scholz RW; Nowack B
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 43(24):9216-22. PubMed ID: 20000512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic probabilistic material flow analysis of engineered nanomaterials in European waste treatment systems.
Rajkovic S; Bornhöft NA; van der Weijden R; Nowack B; Adam V
Waste Manag; 2020 Jul; 113():118-131. PubMed ID: 32531660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials: review of modeling and analytical studies.
Gottschalk F; Sun T; Nowack B
Environ Pollut; 2013 Oct; 181():287-300. PubMed ID: 23856352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Considering the forms of released engineered nanomaterials in probabilistic material flow analysis.
Adam V; Caballero-Guzman A; Nowack B
Environ Pollut; 2018 Dec; 243(Pt A):17-27. PubMed ID: 30170204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comprehensive probabilistic modelling of environmental emissions of engineered nanomaterials.
Sun TY; Gottschalk F; Hungerbühler K; Nowack B
Environ Pollut; 2014 Feb; 185():69-76. PubMed ID: 24220022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Material-specific properties applied to an environmental risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials - implications on grouping and read-across concepts.
Wigger H; Nowack B
Nanotoxicology; 2019 Jun; 13(5):623-643. PubMed ID: 30727799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Environmental and health effects of nanomaterials in nanotextiles and façade coatings.
Som C; Wick P; Krug H; Nowack B
Environ Int; 2011 Aug; 37(6):1131-42. PubMed ID: 21397331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Probabilistic assessment of environmental exposure to the polycyclic musk, HHCB and associated risks in wastewater treatment plant mixing zones and sludge amended soils in the United States.
Federle T; Sun P; Dyer S; Kiel B
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Sep; 493():1079-87. PubMed ID: 24802072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Integrated dynamic probabilistic material flow analysis of engineered materials in all European countries.
Adam V; Wu Q; Nowack B
NanoImpact; 2021 Apr; 22():100312. PubMed ID: 35559969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the Risk of Engineered Nanomaterials in the Environment: Development and Application of the nanoFate Model.
Garner KL; Suh S; Keller AA
Environ Sci Technol; 2017 May; 51(10):5541-5551. PubMed ID: 28443660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling the flows of engineered nanomaterials during waste handling.
Mueller NC; Buha J; Wang J; Ulrich A; Nowack B
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2013 Jan; 15(1):251-9. PubMed ID: 24592442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distinguishing Engineered TiO
Bland GD; Battifarano M; Pradas Del Real AE; Sarret G; Lowry GV
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Mar; 56(5):2990-3001. PubMed ID: 35133134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The release of engineered nanomaterials to the environment.
Gottschalk F; Nowack B
J Environ Monit; 2011 May; 13(5):1145-55. PubMed ID: 21387066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic Probabilistic Modeling of Environmental Emissions of Engineered Nanomaterials.
Sun TY; Bornhöft NA; Hungerbühler K; Nowack B
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 May; 50(9):4701-11. PubMed ID: 27043743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte Carlo simulations of the transformation and removal of Ag, TiO2, and ZnO nanoparticles in wastewater treatment and land application of biosolids.
Barton LE; Auffan M; Durenkamp M; McGrath S; Bottero JY; Wiesner MR
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Apr; 511():535-43. PubMed ID: 25585156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A review of the detection, fate and effects of engineered nanomaterials in wastewater treatment plants.
Neale PA; Jämting ÅK; Escher BI; Herrmann J
Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(7):1440-53. PubMed ID: 24135091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
