These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2341823)

  • 1. Choice behavior in transition: development of preference for the higher probability of reinforcement.
    Bailey JT; Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):409-22. PubMed ID: 2341823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Choice behavior in transition: development of preference with ratio and interval schedules.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Oct; 18(4):364-78. PubMed ID: 1402693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.
    Krägeloh CU; Davison M; Elliffe DM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 16156136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Choice, time and food: continuous cyclical changes in food probability between reinforcers.
    Miranda-Dukoski L; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):406-21. PubMed ID: 24615528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conditioned reinforcement and choice with delayed and uncertain primary reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Mar; 63(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 7714448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.
    Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12083679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Molar versus local reinforcement probability as determinants of stimulus value.
    Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Jan; 59(1):163-72. PubMed ID: 8433063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the joint control of preference by time and reinforcer-ratio variation.
    Davison M; Cowie S; Elliffe D
    Behav Processes; 2013 May; 95():100-12. PubMed ID: 23410902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pigeons' preference for free choice: number of keys versus key area.
    Cerutti D; Catania AC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 Nov; 68(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 9375386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jan; 55(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 2002302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Remembering as discrimination in delayed matching to sample: discriminability and bias.
    Sargisson RJ; White KG
    Learn Behav; 2007 Aug; 35(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 17918423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probability and delay of reinforcement as factors in discrete-trial choice.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1985 May; 43(3):341-51. PubMed ID: 4020322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suboptimal choice in a percentage-reinforcement procedure: effects of signal condition and terminal-link length.
    Spetch ML; Belke TW; Barnet RC; Dunn R; Pierce WD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Mar; 53(2):219-34. PubMed ID: 2324664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contingency discriminability and peak shift in concurrent schedules.
    Krägeloh CU; Elliffe DM; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16903490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preference and resistance to change with constant- and variable-duration terminal links: independence of reinforcement rate and magnitude.
    Grace RC; Bedell MA; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):233-55. PubMed ID: 12083678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of rate of reinforcement and rate of change on choice behaviour in transition.
    Mazur JE
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1997 May; 50(2):111-28. PubMed ID: 9225619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choice with certain and uncertain reinforcers in an adjusting-delay procedure.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Jul; 66(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 8755700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Suboptimal criterion setting in a perceptual choice task with asymmetric reinforcement.
    Stüttgen MC; Kasties N; Lengersdorf D; Starosta S; Güntürkün O; Jäkel F
    Behav Processes; 2013 Jun; 96():59-70. PubMed ID: 23466903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Theories of probabilistic reinforcement.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Jan; 51(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 2921590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The emergence of symmetry in a conditional discrimination task using different responses as propioceptive samples in pigeons.
    García A; Benjumea S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 16903493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.