263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23418870)
1. Predictors for positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon's series in Japan.
Hashimoto T; Yoshioka K; Gondo T; Takeuchi H; Nakagami Y; Nakashima J; Tachibana M
Int J Urol; 2013 Sep; 20(9):873-8. PubMed ID: 23418870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.
Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Champigneulle J; Mangin P; Cormier L
Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 784 Japanese patients.
Hashimoto T; Yoshioka K; Nagao G; Nakagami Y; Ohno Y; Horiguchi Y; Namiki K; Nakashima J; Tachibana M
Int J Urol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 25339062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reality of nerve sparing and surgical margins in surgeons' early experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japan.
Tatsugami K; Yoshioka K; Shiroki R; Eto M; Yoshino Y; Tozawa K; Fukasawa S; Fujisawa M; Takenaka A; Nasu Y; Kashiwagi A; Gotoh M; Terachi T;
Int J Urol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):191-196. PubMed ID: 28122393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Editorial comment to predictors for positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon's series in Japan.
Koutlidis N
Int J Urol; 2013 Sep; 20(9):879. PubMed ID: 23418892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic differences among the positive surgical margin locations following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a large Japanese cohort (the MSUG94 group).
Sasaki T; Ebara S; Tatenuma T; Ikehata Y; Nakayama A; Kawase M; Toide M; Yoneda T; Sakaguchi K; Teishima J; Makiyama K; Kitamura H; Saito K; Koie T; Koga F; Urakami S; Inoue T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2023 Apr; 53(5):443-451. PubMed ID: 36708227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Amigoni N; Shakir A; Corsi P; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Rizzetto R; Bernasconi R; Cerrato C; Tiso L; Migliorini F; Novella G; Brunelli M; De Marco V; Siracusano S; Artibani W
J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):663-675. PubMed ID: 31893344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of positive surgical margins and their location in Korean men undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Choo MS; Cho SY; Jeong CW; Lee SB; Ku JH; Hong SK; Byun SS; Kwak C; Kim HH; Lee SE; Jeong H
Int J Urol; 2014 Sep; 21(9):894-8. PubMed ID: 24807736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pitfalls of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a comparison of positive surgical margins between robotic and laparoscopic surgery.
Tozawa K; Yasui T; Umemoto Y; Mizuno K; Okada A; Kawai N; Takahashi S; Kohri K
Int J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):976-9. PubMed ID: 24912809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance characteristics of prostate-specific antigen density and biopsy core details to predict oncological outcome in patients with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Yashi M; Nukui A; Tokura Y; Takei K; Suzuki I; Sakamoto K; Yuki H; Kambara T; Betsunoh H; Abe H; Fukabori Y; Nakazato Y; Kaji Y; Kamai T
BMC Urol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):47. PubMed ID: 28645325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lymphocele after extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matching study.
Lee JY; Diaz RR; Cho KS; Yu HS; Chung JS; Ham WS; Choi YD
Int J Urol; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1169-76. PubMed ID: 23521086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.
Tanimoto R; Fashola Y; Scotland KB; Calvaresi AE; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD
BMC Urol; 2015 Apr; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25879548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Number of positive preoperative biopsy cores is a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) in small prostates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Tuliao PH; Koo KC; Komninos C; Chang CH; Choi YD; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Rha KH
BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):897-904. PubMed ID: 25098818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perineural invasion status, Gleason score and number of positive cores in biopsy pathology are predictors of positive surgical margin following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Yang R; Cao K; Han T; Zhang YF; Zhang GT; Xu LF; Lian HB; Li XG; Guo HQ
Asian J Androl; 2017; 19(4):468-472. PubMed ID: 27004537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27245233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
