These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23418913)

  • 1. Hoop stress and the conical connection.
    Flanagan D; Phillips J; Connor M; Dyer T; Kazerounian K
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Feb; 41(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 23418913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
    Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of different implant-abutment connections on screw joint stability.
    Michalakis KX; Calvani PL; Muftu S; Pissiotis A; Hirayama H
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 24779947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Failure analysis of an abutment fracture on single implant restoration.
    Imakita C; Shiota M; Yamaguchi Y; Kasugai S; Wakabayashi N
    Implant Dent; 2013 Aug; 22(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 23811721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of engaging abutment position in implant-borne, screw-retained three-unit fixed cantilevered prostheses.
    Dogus SM; Kurtz KS; Watanabe I; Griggs JA
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jul; 20(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 21585587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
    Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
    Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.
    Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
    Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimization of the Conical Angle Design in Conical Implant-Abutment Connections: A Pilot Study Based on the Finite Element Method.
    Yao KT; Chen CS; Cheng CK; Fang HW; Huang CH; Kao HC; Hsu ML
    J Oral Implantol; 2018 Feb; 44(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 29090979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture resistance of the implant-abutment connection in implants with internal hex and internal conical connections under oblique compressive loading: an in vitro study.
    Coppedê AR; Bersani E; de Mattos Mda G; Rodrigues RC; Sartori IA; Ribeiro RF
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 19548411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of different abutment connection designs on the stress distribution around five different implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Balik A; Karatas MO; Keskin H
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Sep; 38 Spec No():491-6. PubMed ID: 21574838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro analysis of resistance to cyclic load and preload distribution of two implant/abutment screwed connections.
    Murmura G; Di Iorio D; Cicchetti AR; Sinjari B; Caputi S
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Jun; 39(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 21231867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implant fracture under dynamic fatigue loading: influence of embedded angle and depth of implant.
    Suzuki H; Hata Y; Watanabe F
    Odontology; 2016 Sep; 104(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 26698312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of tapered and external hexagon connections on bone stresses around tilted dental implants: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical analysis.
    de Faria Almeida DA; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Santiago JF; de Carvalho PS
    J Periodontol; 2014 Feb; 85(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 23688104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
    Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections.
    Asvanund P; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Oct; 106(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 21962585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
    Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
    Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implant-abutment screw joint preload of 7 hex-top abutment systems.
    Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 11432656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.