These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23418931)

  • 1. Assessment of implant-related treatment with edited three-dimensional reconstructed images from cone-beam computerized tomography: a technical note.
    Cortes AR; Pinheiro LR; Umetsubo OS; Arita ES; Cavalcanti MG
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):729-32. PubMed ID: 23418931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dental implantology: an evolving treatment modality.
    Ganz SD
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Sep; 34(8):628-9. PubMed ID: 24564617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Presurgical implant-site assessment and restoratively driven digital planning.
    Scherer MD
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jul; 58(3):561-95. PubMed ID: 24993924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium mesh: a three-dimensional evaluation of factors affecting bone augmentation.
    Lizio G; Corinaldesi G; Marchetti C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):1354-63. PubMed ID: 25397798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Restoratively driven implant dentistry utilizing advanced software and CBCT: realistic abutments and virtual teeth.
    Ganz SD
    Dent Today; 2008 Jul; 27(7):122, 124, 126-7. PubMed ID: 18686668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utilizing digital imaging to enhance the team approach to implant treatment.
    Tischler M
    Dent Today; 2009 Apr; 28(4):86, 88, 90-1. PubMed ID: 19408588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The correlation of bone mineral density and histologic data in the early grafted maxillary sinus: a preliminary report.
    Lee CY; Prasad HS; Suzuki JB; Stover JD; Rohrer MD
    Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):202-14. PubMed ID: 21613947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In-office cone beam computerized tomography: technology review and clinical examples.
    Tischler M
    Dent Today; 2008 Jun; 27(6):102, 104, 106. PubMed ID: 18605111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology.
    van der Zel JM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 18482361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cone beam computerized tomography: basics for digital planning in oral surgery and implantology.
    Rugani P; Kirnbauer B; Arnetzl GV; Jakse N
    Int J Comput Dent; 2009; 12(2):131-45. PubMed ID: 19413269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of the bucco-palatal distance on sinus augmentation outcomes.
    Avila G; Wang HL; Galindo-Moreno P; Misch CE; Bagramian RA; Rudek I; Benavides E; Moreno-Riestra I; Braun T; Neiva R
    J Periodontol; 2010 Jul; 81(7):1041-50. PubMed ID: 20450402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cone beam computed tomography-assisted treatment planning concepts.
    Ganz SD
    Dent Clin North Am; 2011 Jul; 55(3):515-36, viii. PubMed ID: 21726687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Restricting preoperative diagnosis to two-dimensional images in oral implantology can potentially cause implant failures.
    Almog DM
    Alpha Omegan; 2010 Dec; 103(4):136-40. PubMed ID: 21313964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk assessment of lingual plate perforation in posterior mandibular region: a virtual implant placement study using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Chan HL; Benavides E; Yeh CY; Fu JH; Rudek IE; Wang HL
    J Periodontol; 2011 Jan; 82(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 20653440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new imaging modality for intraoperative evaluation of sinus floor augmentation.
    Blake FA; Blessmann M; Pohlenz P; Heiland M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Feb; 37(2):183-5. PubMed ID: 18060742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement.
    Jacobs R; Quirynen M
    Periodontol 2000; 2014 Oct; 66(1):203-13. PubMed ID: 25123769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SIMPLANT® computer-guided implant treatment software: unlocking digital potential.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2014; 35(10):782. PubMed ID: 25742683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of a laboratory-based computer implant guiding system.
    Barnea E; Alt I; Kolerman R; Nissan J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e6-e10. PubMed ID: 20416521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiologic techniques using CBCT and 3-D treatment planning for implant placement.
    Peck JN; Conte GJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Apr; 36(4):287-90, 292-4, 296-7. PubMed ID: 18481625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sinus floor elevation using osteotome technique without grafting materials: a 2-year retrospective study.
    He L; Chang X; Liu Y
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():63-7. PubMed ID: 22150764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.