These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23419135)

  • 1. Evaluating a combined (frequency and percentage) risk expression to communicate information on medicine side effects to patients.
    Knapp P; Gardner P; McMillan B; Raynor DK; Woolf E
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2013 Aug; 21(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 23419135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of numeracy on the comprehension of information about medicines in users of a patient information website.
    Gardner PH; McMillan B; Raynor DK; Woolf E; Knapp P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Jun; 83(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 21621949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Communicating the risk of side effects to patients: an evaluation of UK regulatory recommendations.
    Knapp P; Raynor DK; Woolf E; Gardner PH; Carrigan N; McMillan B
    Drug Saf; 2009; 32(10):837-49. PubMed ID: 19722727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceived risk of medicine side effects in users of a patient information website: a study of the use of verbal descriptors, percentages and natural frequencies.
    Knapp P; Gardner PH; Carrigan N; Raynor DK; Woolf E
    Br J Health Psychol; 2009 Sep; 14(Pt 3):579-94. PubMed ID: 18992183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceived risk of tamoxifen side effects: a study of the use of absolute frequencies or frequency bands, with or without verbal descriptors.
    Knapp P; Gardner PH; Raynor DK; Woolf E; McMillan B
    Patient Educ Couns; 2010 May; 79(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 19896321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined verbal and numerical expressions increase perceived risk of medicine side-effects: a randomized controlled trial of EMA recommendations.
    Knapp P; Gardner PH; Woolf E
    Health Expect; 2016 Apr; 19(2):264-74. PubMed ID: 25645270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Presenting risk information to people with diabetes: evaluating effects and preferences for different formats by a web-based randomised controlled trial.
    Edwards A; Thomas R; Williams R; Ellner AL; Brown P; Elwyn G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Nov; 63(3):336-49. PubMed ID: 16860964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
    Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of two methods of presenting risk information to patients about the side effects of medicines.
    Knapp P; Raynor DK; Berry DC
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2004 Jun; 13(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 15175486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions.
    Timmermans DR; Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Henneman L
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 18722073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions.
    Peters E; Hart PS; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 21191122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expressing medicine side effects: assessing the effectiveness of absolute risk, relative risk, and number needed to harm, and the provision of baseline risk information.
    Berry DC; Knapp P; Raynor T
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):89-96. PubMed ID: 16242904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decision-making about tamoxifen in women at high risk for breast cancer: clinical and psychological factors.
    Bober SL; Hoke LA; Duda RB; Regan MM; Tung NM
    J Clin Oncol; 2004 Dec; 22(24):4951-7. PubMed ID: 15598980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Communicating data about the benefits and harms of treatment: a randomized trial.
    Woloshin S; Schwartz LM
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 21768582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health Professionals Prefer to Communicate Risk-Related Numerical Information Using "1-in-X" Ratios.
    Sirota M; Juanchich M; Petrova D; Garcia-Retamero R; Walasek L; Bhatia S
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Apr; 38(3):366-376. PubMed ID: 29068246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of new multimedia formats for cancer communications.
    Bader JL; Strickman-Stein N
    J Med Internet Res; 2003; 5(3):e16. PubMed ID: 14517107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tailoring risk communication to improve comprehension: Do patient preferences help or hurt?
    Barnes AJ; Hanoch Y; Miron-Shatz T; Ozanne EM
    Health Psychol; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1007-16. PubMed ID: 27183307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of adverse information and positive promotion on women's preferences for prescribed contraceptive products.
    Knox SA; Viney RC; Gu Y; Hole AR; Fiebig DG; Street DJ; Haas MR; Weisberg E; Bateson D
    Soc Sci Med; 2013 Apr; 83():70-80. PubMed ID: 23351426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A test of numeric formats for communicating risk probabilities.
    Cuite CL; Weinstein ND; Emmons K; Colditz G
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 18480036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Probability information in risk communication: a review of the research literature.
    Visschers VH; Meertens RM; Passchier WW; de Vries NN
    Risk Anal; 2009 Feb; 29(2):267-87. PubMed ID: 19000070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.