These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23419895)
1. The role of character-based knowledge in online narrative comprehension: evidence from eye movements and ERPs. Filik R; Leuthold H Brain Res; 2013 Apr; 1506():94-104. PubMed ID: 23419895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Eye-movements and ERPs reveal the time course of processing negation and remitting counterfactual worlds. Ferguson HJ; Sanford AJ; Leuthold H Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1236():113-25. PubMed ID: 18722356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does the character-based dimension of stories impact narrative processing? An event-related potentials (ERPs) study. Chiera A; Adornetti I; Altavilla D; Acciai A; Cosentino E; Deriu V; McCarroll C; Nicchiarelli S; Preziotti V; Ferretti F Cogn Process; 2022 May; 23(2):255-267. PubMed ID: 35048215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Importance of Reading Naturally: Evidence From Combined Recordings of Eye Movements and Electric Brain Potentials. Metzner P; von der Malsburg T; Vasishth S; Rösler F Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 6():1232-1263. PubMed ID: 27307404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Embodiment during reading: Simulating a story character's linguistic actions. Gunraj DN; Drumm-Hewitt AM; Klin CM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):364-75. PubMed ID: 24219085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The interaction of discourse context and world knowledge in online sentence comprehension. Evidence from the N400. Hald LA; Steenbeek-Planting EG; Hagoort P Brain Res; 2007 May; 1146():210-8. PubMed ID: 17433893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension. Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Brain responses to world knowledge violations: a comparison of stimulus- and fixation-triggered event-related potentials and neural oscillations. Metzner P; von der Malsburg T; Vasishth S; Rösler F J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May; 27(5):1017-28. PubMed ID: 25269112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distinguishing different fictional worlds during sentence comprehension: ERP evidence. Yang J; Xue J Psychophysiology; 2014 Jan; 51(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 24147613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations. Hagoort P J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What makes a discourse constraining? Comparing the effects of discourse message and scenario fit on the discourse-dependent N400 effect. Otten M; Van Berkum JJ Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 1153():166-77. PubMed ID: 17466281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dissociating word frequency and predictability effects in reading: Evidence from coregistration of eye movements and EEG. Kretzschmar F; Schlesewsky M; Staub A J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1648-62. PubMed ID: 26010829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Right hemisphere activation of joke-related information: an event-related brain potential study. Coulson S; Wu YC J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Mar; 17(3):494-506. PubMed ID: 15814008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Late interaction of syntactic and prosodic processes in sentence comprehension as revealed by ERPs. Eckstein K; Friederici AD Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):130-43. PubMed ID: 15967649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an ERP study. Ye Z; Zhan W; Zhou X Brain Res; 2007 Apr; 1142():135-45. PubMed ID: 17303093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Incidental picture exposure affects later reading: evidence from the N400. Coppens LC; Gootjes L; Zwaan RA Brain Lang; 2012 Jul; 122(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 22560006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of brain mechanisms underlying the processing of Chinese characters and pseudo-characters: an event-related potential study. Wang T; Li H; Zhang Q; Tu S; Yu C; Qiu J Int J Psychol; 2010 Apr; 45(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22043890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Examining the cognitive costs of counterfactual language comprehension: Evidence from ERPs. Ferguson HJ; Cane JE Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 1622():252-69. PubMed ID: 26119912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An ERP study of motor compatibility effects in action language. Santana EJ; de Vega M Brain Res; 2013 Aug; 1526():71-83. PubMed ID: 23796780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of animacy in the real time comprehension of Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from auditory event-related brain potentials. Philipp M; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I; Bisang W; Schlesewsky M Brain Lang; 2008 May; 105(2):112-33. PubMed ID: 17996287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]