These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23420236)

  • 1. Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors.
    Hayden JA; van der Windt DA; Cartwright JL; Côté P; Bombardier C
    Ann Intern Med; 2013 Feb; 158(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 23420236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Risk of bias assessment: (7) Assessing Bias in Studies of Prognostic Factors].
    Tang SW; Zhang Y; Tao BL; Yang ZR; Sun F; Zhan SY
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 39(7):1003-1008. PubMed ID: 30060320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement.
    Hoy D; Brooks P; Woolf A; Blyth F; March L; Bain C; Baker P; Smith E; Buchbinder R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Sep; 65(9):934-9. PubMed ID: 22742910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews.
    Hayden JA; Côté P; Bombardier C
    Ann Intern Med; 2006 Mar; 144(6):427-37. PubMed ID: 16549855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interim PET-results for prognosis in adults with Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies.
    Aldin A; Umlauff L; Estcourt LJ; Collins G; Moons KG; Engert A; Kobe C; von Tresckow B; Haque M; Foroutan F; Kreuzberger N; Trivella M; Skoetz N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Sep; 9(9):CD012643. PubMed ID: 31525824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Elaborating on the assessment of the risk of bias in prognostic studies in pain rehabilitation using QUIPS-aspects of interrater agreement.
    Grooten WJA; Tseli E; Äng BO; Boersma K; Stålnacke BM; Gerdle B; Enthoven P
    Diagn Progn Res; 2019; 3():5. PubMed ID: 31093575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Important outcome predictors showed greater baseline heterogeneity than age in two systematic reviews.
    Clark L; Fairhurst C; Cook E; Torgerson DJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 25457029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review.
    Hayden JA; Wilson MN; Riley RD; Iles R; Pincus T; Ogilvie R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 2019(11):. PubMed ID: 31765487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing the risk of bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs.
    Hartling L; Hamm MP; Milne A; Vandermeer B; Santaguida PL; Ansari M; Tsertsvadze A; Hempel S; Shekelle P; Dryden DM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 66(9):973-81. PubMed ID: 22981249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new risk of bias checklist applicable to randomized trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews was developed and validated to be used for systematic reviews focusing on drug adverse events.
    Faillie JL; Ferrer P; Gouverneur A; Driot D; Berkemeyer S; Vidal X; Martínez-Zapata MJ; Huerta C; Castells X; Rottenkolber M; Schmiedl S; Sabaté M; Ballarín E; Ibáñez L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():168-175. PubMed ID: 28487158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic reviews of low back pain prognosis had variable methods and results: guidance for future prognosis reviews.
    Hayden JA; Chou R; Hogg-Johnson S; Bombardier C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):781-796.e1. PubMed ID: 19136234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study.
    Gates A; Gates M; Duarte G; Cary M; Becker M; Prediger B; Vandermeer B; Fernandes RM; Pieper D; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 7(1):85. PubMed ID: 29898777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inter-rater reliability and validity of risk of bias instrument for non-randomized studies of exposures: a study protocol.
    Jeyaraman MM; Al-Yousif N; Robson RC; Copstein L; Balijepalli C; Hofer K; Fazeli MS; Ansari MT; Tricco AC; Rabbani R; Abou-Setta AM
    Syst Rev; 2020 Feb; 9(1):32. PubMed ID: 32051035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does nailfold capillaroscopy help predict future outcomes in systemic sclerosis? A systematic literature review.
    Paxton D; Pauling JD
    Semin Arthritis Rheum; 2018 Dec; 48(3):482-494. PubMed ID: 29602558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations.
    Gomersall JS; Jadotte YT; Xue Y; Lockwood S; Riddle D; Preda A
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 26288063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Poor reliability between Cochrane reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the Cochrane risk of bias tool in physical therapy trials.
    Armijo-Olivo S; Ospina M; da Costa BR; Egger M; Saltaji H; Fuentes J; Ha C; Cummings GG
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96920. PubMed ID: 24824199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methodology for the systematic reviews on an evidence-based approach for the management of chronic low back pain.
    Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fehlings MG; Fourney DR; Chapman JR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S10-8. PubMed ID: 21952182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prevalence and pattern of co-occurring musculoskeletal pain and its association with back-related disability among people with persistent low back pain: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Overaas CK; Johansson MS; de Campos TF; Ferreira ML; Natvig B; Mork PJ; Hartvigsen J
    Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):258. PubMed ID: 29246253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 66.