These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23420468)
1. Scientific misconduct: three forms that directly harm others as the modus operandi of Mill's tyranny of the prevailing opinion. Cabbolet MJ Sci Eng Ethics; 2014 Mar; 20(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 23420468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Swedish Research Council's definition of 'scientific misconduct': a critique. Salwén H Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Feb; 21(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 24488724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Misconduct versus honest error and scientific disagreement. Resnik DB; Stewart CN Account Res; 2012; 19(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 22268506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chilean researchers unhappy following investigation of star neuroscientist. Mega ER Nature; 2021 Oct; 598(7881):396-397. PubMed ID: 34646032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. How researchers perceive research misconduct in biomedicine and how they would prevent it: A qualitative study in a small scientific community. Buljan I; Barać L; Marušić A Account Res; 2018; 25(4):220-238. PubMed ID: 29637796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country. Okonta PI; Rossouw T BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Mar; 15():25. PubMed ID: 24666413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The perverse effects of competition on scientists' work and relationships. Anderson MS; Ronning EA; De Vries R; Martinson BC Sci Eng Ethics; 2007 Dec; 13(4):437-61. PubMed ID: 18030595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Research misconduct and the scientific process: continuing quality improvement. Koppelman-White E Account Res; 2006; 13(3):225-46. PubMed ID: 17124759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct. Resnik DB Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Research misconduct and crime lessons from criminal science on preventing misconduct and promoting integrity. Adams D; Pimple KD Account Res; 2005; 12(3):225-40. PubMed ID: 16634173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Researchers' interpretations of research integrity: A qualitative study. Shaw D; Satalkar P Account Res; 2018; 25(2):79-93. PubMed ID: 29291621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Responsibility for scientific misconduct in collaborative papers. Helgesson G; Eriksson S Med Health Care Philos; 2018 Sep; 21(3):423-430. PubMed ID: 29222668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct. Sovacool BK Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A proposed research misconduct policy for universities and postgraduate colleges in developing countries. Adesanya AA Niger Postgrad Med J; 2020; 27(3):250-258. PubMed ID: 32687128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors associated with scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education. Maggio L; Dong T; Driessen E; Artino A Perspect Med Educ; 2019 Apr; 8(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 30915714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. World Map of Scientific Misconduct. Ataie-Ashtiani B Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1653-1656. PubMed ID: 28653166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]