These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23420511)

  • 1. How the Thatcher illusion reveals evolutionary differences in the face processing of primates.
    Weldon KB; Taubert J; Smith CL; Parr LA
    Anim Cogn; 2013 Sep; 16(5):691-700. PubMed ID: 23420511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thatcher effect in monkeys demonstrates conservation of face perception across primates.
    Adachi I; Chou DP; Hampton RR
    Curr Biol; 2009 Aug; 19(15):1270-3. PubMed ID: 19559613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Orientation-sensitivity to facial features explains the Thatcher illusion.
    Psalta L; Young AW; Thompson P; Andrews TJ
    J Vis; 2014 Oct; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 25301017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Thatcher illusion in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus).
    Nakata R; Osada Y
    Anim Cogn; 2012 Jul; 15(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 22411620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural Correlate of the Thatcher Face Illusion in a Monkey Face-Selective Patch.
    Taubert J; Van Belle G; Vanduffel W; Rossion B; Vogels R
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jul; 35(27):9872-8. PubMed ID: 26156988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The inversion effect reveals species differences in face processing.
    Parr LA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):204-10. PubMed ID: 21784381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Geometric distortions affect face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Taubert J; Parr LA
    Anim Cogn; 2011 Jan; 14(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 20632050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The composite face effect in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Taubert J; Qureshi AA; Parr LA
    J Comp Psychol; 2012 Nov; 126(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 22390621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discriminating grotesque from typical faces: evidence from the Thatcher illusion.
    Donnelly N; Zürcher NR; Cornes K; Snyder J; Naik P; Hadwin J; Hadjikhani N
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(8):e23340. PubMed ID: 21912594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Face processing at birth: a Thatcher illusion study.
    Leo I; Simion F
    Dev Sci; 2009 Apr; 12(3):492-8. PubMed ID: 19371374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) lack expertise in face processing.
    Parr LA; Heintz M; Pradhan G
    J Comp Psychol; 2008 Nov; 122(4):390-402. PubMed ID: 19014263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Thatcher illusion in humans and monkeys.
    Dahl CD; Logothetis NK; Bülthoff HH; Wallraven C
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Oct; 277(1696):2973-81. PubMed ID: 20484235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing neural correlates of configural processing in faces and objects: an ERP study of the Thatcher illusion.
    Boutsen L; Humphreys GW; Praamstra P; Warbrick T
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(1):352-67. PubMed ID: 16632381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Thatcher illusion reveals orientation dependence in brain regions involved in processing facial expressions.
    Psalta L; Young AW; Thompson P; Andrews TJ
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 24264941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inversion and configuration of faces.
    Bartlett JC; Searcy J
    Cogn Psychol; 1993 Jul; 25(3):281-316. PubMed ID: 8354050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do primates see the solitaire illusion differently? A comparative assessment of humans (Homo sapiens), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).
    Agrillo C; Parrish AE; Beran MJ
    J Comp Psychol; 2014 Nov; 128(4):402-13. PubMed ID: 25133464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of inversion on the encoding of normal and "thatcherized" faces.
    Boutsen L; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):955-75. PubMed ID: 12881166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The importance of surface-based cues for face discrimination in non-human primates.
    Parr LA; Taubert J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Jul; 278(1714):1964-72. PubMed ID: 21123266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feature-location effects in the Thatcher illusion.
    de Haas B; Schwarzkopf DS
    J Vis; 2018 Apr; 18(4):16. PubMed ID: 29710306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of the Ponzo illusion by rhesus monkeys, chimpanzees, and humans: similarity and difference in the three primate species.
    Fujita K
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Feb; 59(2):284-92. PubMed ID: 9055623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.