BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23420855)

  • 1. Assessment of the effective doses from two dental cone beam CT devices.
    Schilling R; Geibel MA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(5):20120273. PubMed ID: 23420855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
    Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.
    Suomalainen A; Kiljunen T; Käser Y; Peltola J; Kortesniemi M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology.
    Ludlow JB; Ivanovic M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 18504152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry.
    Roberts JA; Drage NA; Davies J; Thomas DW
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):35-40. PubMed ID: 18852212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effective radiation dose of ProMax 3D cone-beam computerized tomography scanner with different dental protocols.
    Qu XM; Li G; Ludlow JB; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Dec; 110(6):770-6. PubMed ID: 20952220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation.
    Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Bumann A; Visser H; Hirsch E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):640.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18456133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A manufacturer's role in reducing the dose of cone beam computed tomography examinations: effect of beam filtration.
    Ludlow JB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Feb; 40(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 21239575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparative dosimetry of dental cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography for oral and maxillofacial radiology].
    Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 46(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 22321628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. TLD measurements and Monte Carlo calculations of head and neck organ and effective doses for cone beam computed tomography using 3D Accuitomo 170.
    Ernst M; Manser P; Dula K; Volken W; Stampanoni MF; Fix MK
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Oct; 46(7):20170047. PubMed ID: 28749697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effective radiation dose and eye lens dose in dental cone beam CT: effect of field of view and angle of rotation.
    Pauwels R; Zhang G; Theodorakou C; Walker A; Bosmans H; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Horner K;
    Br J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 87(1042):20130654. PubMed ID: 25189417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL; Howerton WB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 16798915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effective dose of dental CBCT-a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units.
    Ludlow JB; Timothy R; Walker C; Hunter R; Benavides E; Samuelson DB; Scheske MJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(1):20140197. PubMed ID: 25224586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT.
    Tsiklakis K; Donta C; Gavala S; Karayianni K; Kamenopoulou V; Hourdakis CJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Dec; 56(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 15978765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of absorbed and effective dose from two dental cone beam computed tomography scanners].
    Okano T; Matsuo A; Gotoh K; Yokoi M; Hirukawa A; Okumura S; Koyama S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 22449896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of effective dose for imaging of mandible between multi-detector CT and cone-beam CT.
    Jeong DK; Lee SC; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2012 Jun; 42(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 22783473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.
    Granlund C; Thilander-Klang A; Ylhan B; Lofthag-Hansen S; Ekestubbe A
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20151052. PubMed ID: 27452261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dose reduction of cone beam CT scanning for the entire oral and maxillofacial regions with thyroid collars.
    Qu XM; Li G; Sanderink GC; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Jul; 41(5):373-8. PubMed ID: 22707330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of the radiation dose for dental spectral cone-beam CT.
    Orhan K; Pauwels R; Chen Y; Song D; Jacobs R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Jul; 50(5):20200372. PubMed ID: 33353401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effective dose span of ten different cone beam CT devices.
    Rottke D; Patzelt S; Poxleitner P; Schulze D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20120417. PubMed ID: 23584925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.