These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23420864)

  • 1. Diagnostic imaging of trabecular bone microstructure for oral implants: a literature review.
    Ibrahim N; Parsa A; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(3):20120075. PubMed ID: 23420864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity and specificity of radiographic methods for predicting insertion torque of dental implants.
    Cortes AR; Eimar H; Barbosa Jde S; Costa C; Arita ES; Tamimi F
    J Periodontol; 2015 May; 86(5):646-55. PubMed ID: 25594426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiography of the mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment. Localization of the mandibular canal and assessment of trabecular bone.
    Lindh C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 112():1-45. PubMed ID: 8782328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Morphometric analysis of mandibular trabecular bone using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study.
    Naitoh M; Aimiya H; Hirukawa A; Ariji E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1093-8. PubMed ID: 21197484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Osseointegration in Implants using Digital Orthopantomogram and Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Chopra A; Mhapuskar AA; Marathe S; Nisa SU; Thopte S; Saddiwal R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):953-957. PubMed ID: 27965508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of cone-beam computed tomography in early detection of implant failure.
    Yepes JF; Al-Sabbagh M
    Dent Clin North Am; 2015 Jan; 59(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 25434558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of relationship between preoperative bone density values derived from cone beam computed tomography and implant stability parameters: a clinical study.
    Salimov F; Tatli U; Kürkçü M; Akoğlan M; Oztunç H; Kurtoğlu C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1016-21. PubMed ID: 23772811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A case for routine computed tomography imaging of the dental alveolus before implant placement.
    Kraut RA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jan; 59(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 11152191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation of radiographic analysis during initial planning and tactile perception during the placement of implants.
    Mesquita Júnior EJ; Vieta AI; Taba Júnior M; Faria PE
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 55(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 27633904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
    Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
    Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessments of trabecular bone density at implant sites on CT images.
    de Oliveira RC; Leles CR; Normanha LM; Lindh C; Ribeiro-Rotta RF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 18230392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of dental CT imaging in dental implantology.
    Bernaerts A; Vanhoenacker FM; Chapelle K; Hintjens J; Parizel PM
    JBR-BTR; 2006; 89(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 16607875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic imaging for dental implant assessment.
    Benson BW
    Tex Dent J; 1995 Feb; 112(2):37-41. PubMed ID: 8633304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implant imaging. Status, controversies, and new developments.
    Reiskin AB
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Jan; 42(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 9421669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.
    Lam EW; Ruprecht A; Yang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7674189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Restricting preoperative diagnosis to two-dimensional images in oral implantology can potentially cause implant failures.
    Almog DM
    Alpha Omegan; 2010 Dec; 103(4):136-40. PubMed ID: 21313964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography.
    Tyndall DA; Price JB; Tetradis S; Ganz SD; Hildebolt C; Scarfe WC;
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Jun; 113(6):817-26. PubMed ID: 22668710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study.
    Sahota J; Bhatia A; Gupta M; Singh V; Soni J; Soni R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):665-669. PubMed ID: 28816186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
    González-García R; Monje F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.