These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23420978)

  • 1. Motor equivalent strategies in the production of German /∫/ under perturbation.
    Brunner J; Hoole P
    Lang Speech; 2012 Dec; 55(Pt 4):457-76. PubMed ID: 23420978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of auditory acuity on acoustic variability and the use of motor equivalence during adaptation to a perturbation.
    Brunner J; Ghosh S; Hoole P; Matthies M; Tiede M; Perkell J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):727-39. PubMed ID: 20966388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of blindness on production-perception relationships: Compensation strategies for a lip-tube perturbation of the French [u].
    Ménard L; Turgeon C; Trudeau-Fisette P; Bellavance-Courtemanche M
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2016; 30(3-5):227-48. PubMed ID: 26403592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Articulatory and acoustic adaptation to palatal perturbation.
    Thibeault M; Ménard L; Baum SR; Richard G; McFarland DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2112-20. PubMed ID: 21476667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compensations to auditory feedback perturbations in congenitally blind and sighted speakers: Acoustic and articulatory data.
    Trudeau-Fisette P; Tiede M; Ménard L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180300. PubMed ID: 28678819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptation strategies in perturbed /s/.
    Brunner J; Hoole P; Perrier P
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2011 Aug; 25(8):705-24. PubMed ID: 21417737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the relationship between palate shape and articulatory behavior.
    Brunner J; Fuchs S; Perrier P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3936-49. PubMed ID: 19507976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tongue-palate contact during bilabials in normal speech.
    Gibbon FE; Lee A; Yuen I
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2007 Jan; 44(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 17214529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Compensation for a lip-tube perturbation in 4-year-olds: Articulatory, acoustic, and perceptual data analyzed in comparison with adults.
    Ménard L; Perrier P; Aubin J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2514. PubMed ID: 27250147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An auditory-feedback-based neural network model of speech production that is robust to developmental changes in the size and shape of the articulatory system.
    Callan DE; Kent RD; Guenther FH; Vorperian HK
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):721-36. PubMed ID: 10877441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trading relations between tongue-body raising and lip rounding in production of the vowel /u/: a pilot "motor equivalence" study.
    Perkell JS; Matthies ML; Svirsky MA; Jordan MI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 May; 93(5):2948-61. PubMed ID: 8315158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adult speakers' tongue-palate contact patterns for bilabial stops within complex clusters.
    Zharkova N; Schaeffler S; Gibbon FE
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2009 Dec; 23(12):901-10. PubMed ID: 20001306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Palatal morphology can influence speaker-specific realizations of phonemic contrasts.
    Weirich M; Fuchs S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 56(6):S1894-908. PubMed ID: 24687445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A preliminary report of oral tactile sensation and responses to delayed auditory feedback.
    Cantrell J; Fucci D; Petrosino L; Nance R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Apr; 66(2):487-93. PubMed ID: 3399323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speakers are able to categorize vowels based on tongue somatosensation.
    Patri JF; Ostry DJ; Diard J; Schwartz JL; Trudeau-Fisette P; Savariaux C; Perrier P
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Mar; 117(11):6255-6263. PubMed ID: 32123070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Articulatory and acoustic correlates of contrastive focus in congenitally blind adults and sighted adults.
    Ménard L; Leclerc A; Tiede M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 57(3):793-804. PubMed ID: 24687083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic consequences of differences in male and female vocal tract dimensions.
    Simpson AP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2153-64. PubMed ID: 11386567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interspeaker variability in hard palate morphology and vowel production.
    Lammert A; Proctor M; Narayanan S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 56(6):S1924-33. PubMed ID: 24687447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Articulatory-acoustic kinematics: the production of American English /s/.
    Iskarous K; Shadle CH; Proctor MI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):944-54. PubMed ID: 21361451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception.
    Villacorta VM; Perkell JS; Guenther FH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2306-19. PubMed ID: 17902866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.