These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Perceptual learning in an appetitive Pavlovian procedure: analysis of the effectiveness of the common element. Mondragón E; Murphy RA Behav Processes; 2010 Mar; 83(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 20026195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of preexposure on stimulus discrimination: an investigation of the mechanisms responsible for human perceptual learning. Lavis Y; Mitchell C Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Dec; 59(12):2083-101. PubMed ID: 17095489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Perceptual learning to discriminate the intensity and spatial location of nociceptive stimuli. Mancini F; Dolgilevica K; Steckelmacher J; Haggard P; Friston K; Iannetti GD Sci Rep; 2016 Dec; 6():39104. PubMed ID: 27996022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Human perceptual learning: the effect of pre-exposure schedule depends on task demands. Angulo R; Alonso G Behav Processes; 2012 Nov; 91(3):244-52. PubMed ID: 23022603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination. Fujisaki W; Nishida S Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Location and salience of unique features in human perceptual learning. Wang T; Lavis Y; Hall G; Mitchell CJ J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Oct; 38(4):407-18. PubMed ID: 22984922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of perceptual learning of real and virtual line orientations: an event-related potential study. Wang F; Zhong X; Huang J; Ding Y; Song Y Vision Res; 2013 Dec; 93():1-9. PubMed ID: 24139921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Blocked and test-stimulus exposure effects in perceptual learning re-examined. Sanjuan Mdel C; Alonso G; Nelson JB Behav Processes; 2004 Apr; 66(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 15062968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fast task-irrelevant perceptual learning is disrupted by sudden onset of central task elements. Leclercq V; Seitz AR Vision Res; 2012 May; 61():70-6. PubMed ID: 21810439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An integrated reweighting theory of perceptual learning. Dosher BA; Jeter P; Liu J; Lu ZL Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Aug; 110(33):13678-83. PubMed ID: 23898204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The classical TDT perceptual learning is mostly temporal learning. Wang R; Cong LJ; Yu C J Vis; 2013 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 23584630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Perceptual learning transfer between hemispheres and tasks for easy and hard feature search conditions. Pavlovskaya M; Hochstein S J Vis; 2011 Jan; 11(1):8. PubMed ID: 21216770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Perceptual learning improves efficiency by re-tuning the decision 'template' for position discrimination. Li RW; Levi DM; Klein SA Nat Neurosci; 2004 Feb; 7(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 14730311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Visual perceptual learning is similar across the extrafoveal central visual fields. Neary K; Anand S; Hotson JR Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2009; 27(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 19531873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Feedforward and quick recurrent processes in early visual cortex revealed by TMS? de Graaf TA; Goebel R; Sack AT Neuroimage; 2012 Jul; 61(3):651-9. PubMed ID: 22032946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]