These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23421442)

  • 1. The effects of goal-driven and data-driven regulation on metacognitive monitoring during learning: a developmental perspective.
    Koriat A; Ackerman R; Adiv S; Lockl K; Schneider W
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):386-403. PubMed ID: 23421442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attributing study effort to data-driven and goal-driven effects: implications for metacognitive judgments.
    Koriat A; Nussinson R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1338-43. PubMed ID: 19686026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Judgments of learning depend on how learners interpret study effort.
    Koriat A; Nussinson R; Ackerman R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1624-37. PubMed ID: 24707787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The memorizing effort heuristic in judgments of learning: a developmental perspective.
    Koriat A; Ackerman R; Lockl K; Schneider W
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Mar; 102(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 19084238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Judgments of learning do not reduce to memory encoding operations: event-related potential evidence for distinct metacognitive processes.
    Skavhaug IM; Wilding EL; Donaldson DI
    Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1318():87-95. PubMed ID: 19968975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metacognition and mindreading: judgments of learning for Self and Other during self-paced study.
    Koriat A; Ackerman R
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):251-64. PubMed ID: 20096606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developmental changes and the effect of self-generated feedback in metacognitive controlled spacing strategies in 7-year-olds, 10-year-olds, and adults.
    Tsalas N; Paulus M; Sodian B
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Apr; 132():140-54. PubMed ID: 25703006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Framing affects scale usage for judgments of learning, not confidence in memory.
    England BD; Ortegren FR; Serra MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1898-1908. PubMed ID: 28504530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metacognitive monitoring of oneself and others: developmental changes during childhood and adolescence.
    Paulus M; Tsalas N; Proust J; Sodian B
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Jun; 122():153-65. PubMed ID: 24607803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early metacognitive abilities: the interplay of monitoring and control processes in 5- to 7-year-old children.
    Destan N; Hembacher E; Ghetti S; Roebers CM
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Oct; 126():213-28. PubMed ID: 24945686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metacognitive unawareness of the errorful generation benefit and its effects on self-regulated learning.
    Yang C; Potts R; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1073-1092. PubMed ID: 28114778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An ERP study on metacognitive monitoring processes in children.
    Tsalas NRH; Müller BCN; Meinhardt J; Proust J; Paulus M; Sodian B
    Brain Res; 2018 Sep; 1695():84-90. PubMed ID: 29852136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-paced study time as a cue for recall predictions across school age.
    Hoffmann-Biencourt A; Lockl K; Schneider W; Ackerman R; Koriat A
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2010 Nov; 28(Pt 4):767-84. PubMed ID: 21121466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. More than just beliefs: Experience and beliefs jointly contribute to volume effects on metacognitive judgments.
    Frank DJ; Kuhlmann BG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):680-693. PubMed ID: 27709983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comprehension as a basis for metacognitive judgments: effects of effort after meaning on recall and metacognition.
    Zaromb FM; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):552-7. PubMed ID: 20192550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring.
    Soderstrom NC; McCabe DP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 21574750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Metacognitive judgments-of-learning in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.
    Wojcik DZ; Waterman AH; Lestié C; Moulin CJ; Souchay C
    Autism; 2014 May; 18(4):393-408. PubMed ID: 24151127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Embodiment meets metamemory: weight as a cue for metacognitive judgments.
    Alban MW; Kelley CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1628-34. PubMed ID: 23565793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring memory monitoring with judgements of retention (JORs).
    Tauber SK; Rhodes MG
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(7):1376-96. PubMed ID: 22524495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mending metacognitive illusions: a comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures.
    Koriat A; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1133-45. PubMed ID: 16938051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.