These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23421505)

  • 1. The negative testing effect and multifactor account.
    Peterson DJ; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1287-93. PubMed ID: 23421505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The joint influence of collaboration and part-set cueing.
    Kelley MR; Pentz C; Reysen MB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):1977-85. PubMed ID: 24460096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):737-46. PubMed ID: 22060276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
    Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contextual match and cue-independence of retrieval-induced forgetting: Testing the prediction of the model by Norman, Newman, and Detre (2007).
    Hanczakowski M; Mazzoni G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):953-8. PubMed ID: 23088549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing and feedback effects on front-end control over later retrieval.
    Thomas RC; McDaniel MA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):437-50. PubMed ID: 22732026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive load hypothesis of item-method directed forgetting.
    Lee YS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1110-22. PubMed ID: 22372566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing enhances both encoding and retrieval for both tested and untested items.
    Cho KW; Neely JH; Crocco S; Vitrano D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1211-1235. PubMed ID: 27049596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The negative repetition effect.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1403-16. PubMed ID: 23421508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Memory as discrimination: a challenge to the encoding-retrieval match principle.
    Poirier M; Nairne JS; Morin C; Zimmermann FG; Koutmeridou K; Fowler J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):16-29. PubMed ID: 21823814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The longer we have to forget the more we remember: The ironic effect of postcue duration in item-based directed forgetting.
    Bancroft TD; Hockley WE; Farquhar R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):691-9. PubMed ID: 22845067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does testing impair relational processing? Failed attempts to replicate the negative testing effect.
    Rawson KA; Wissman KT; Vaughn KE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1326-36. PubMed ID: 25961357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inhibitory control in memory: evidence for negative priming in free recall.
    Marsh JE; Beaman CP; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1377-88. PubMed ID: 22468802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrieval induces forgetting, but only when nontested items compete for retrieval: Implication for interference, inhibition, and context reinstatement.
    Chan JC; Erdman MR; Davis SD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1298-315. PubMed ID: 25621869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inhibition and retrieval of facts in young and older adults.
    Gómez-Ariza CJ; Pelegrina S; Lechuga MT; Suárez A; Bajo MT
    Exp Aging Res; 2009; 35(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 19173103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect.
    Carpenter SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1547-52. PubMed ID: 21707217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The testing effect under divided attention.
    Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1934-1947. PubMed ID: 28504527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
    Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Paradoxical effects of testing: retrieval enhances both accurate recall and suggestibility in eyewitnesses.
    Chan JC; Langley MM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):248-55. PubMed ID: 20919785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selective memory retrieval can impair and improve retrieval of other memories.
    Bäuml KH; Samenieh A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):488-94. PubMed ID: 21942495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.