These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23421515)

  • 1. Comparison promotes learning and transfer of relational categories.
    Kurtz KJ; Boukrina O; Gentner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1303-10. PubMed ID: 23421515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting transfer performance: a comparison of competing function learning models.
    McDaniel MA; Dimperio E; Griego JA; Busemeyer JR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):173-95. PubMed ID: 19210089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transfer of learned category-response associations is modulated by instruction.
    Longman CS; Milton F; Wills AJ; Verbruggen F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Mar; 184():144-167. PubMed ID: 28454893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relational matching in baboons (Papio papio) with reduced grouping requirements.
    Fagot J; Parron C
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Apr; 36(2):184-93. PubMed ID: 20384399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Associative learning, acquired equivalence, and flexible generalization of knowledge in mild Alzheimer disease.
    Bódi N; Csibri E; Myers CE; Gluck MA; Kéri S
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2009 Jun; 22(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 19506424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differential outcomes facilitate same/different concept learning.
    Schmidtke KA; Katz JS; Wright AA
    Anim Cogn; 2010 May; 13(3):583-9. PubMed ID: 19937079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison-based learning of relational categories (you'll never guess).
    Patterson JD; Kurtz KJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 May; 46(5):851-871. PubMed ID: 31535890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does practice in category learning increase rule use or exemplar use-or both?
    Thibaut JP; Gelaes S; Murphy GL
    Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):530-543. PubMed ID: 29313292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tests enhance the transfer of learning.
    Rohrer D; Taylor K; Sholar B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):233-9. PubMed ID: 20053059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Associative relationships in human predictive learning.
    Gámez AM; Martos R; Abad MJ; Rosas JM
    Span J Psychol; 2013; 16():E5. PubMed ID: 23866246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the transfer of prior tests or study events to subsequent study.
    Storm BC; Friedman MC; Murayama K; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):115-24. PubMed ID: 23978234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can patients with Alzheimer's disease learn a category implicitly?
    Bozoki A; Grossman M; Smith EE
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(5):816-27. PubMed ID: 16229868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unintentional and intentional learning of noncorresponding stimulus-response associations in the Simon task.
    Vu KP
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Feb; 136(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 20605125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
    Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transfer of associability and relational structure in human associative learning.
    Livesey EJ; Don HJ; Uengoer M; Thorwart A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):125-142. PubMed ID: 30816735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning relational concepts from within- versus between-category comparisons.
    Corral D; Kurtz KJ; Jones M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Nov; 147(11):1571-1596. PubMed ID: 30372111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Actively learning object names across ambiguous situations.
    Kachergis G; Yu C; Shiffrin RM
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Jan; 5(1):200-13. PubMed ID: 23335580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of relational structure on analogical learning.
    Corral D; Jones M
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):280-300. PubMed ID: 24858106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of training condition on the contribution of specific items to relational processing in baboons (Papio papio).
    Maugard A; Wasserman EA; Castro L; Fagot J
    Anim Cogn; 2014 Jul; 17(4):911-24. PubMed ID: 24352791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Matching-to-sample abstract-concept learning by pigeons.
    Bodily KD; Katz JS; Wright AA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Jan; 34(1):178-84. PubMed ID: 18248124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.