These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23421544)

  • 1. Performance characteristics of two automated solid-phase red cell adherence systems for pretransfusion antibody screening: a cautionary tale.
    Quillen K; Caron J; Murphy K
    Immunohematology; 2012; 28(4):137-9. PubMed ID: 23421544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antibody identification using both automated solid-phase red cell adherence assay and a tube polyethylene glycol antiglobulin method.
    Yamada C; Serrano-Rahman L; Vasovic LV; Mohandas K; Uehlinger J
    Transfusion; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1693-8. PubMed ID: 18482178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Solid Phase Red Cell Adherence Assay: a tubeless method for pretransfusion testing and other applications in transfusion science.
    Ching E
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2012 Jun; 46(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 22475547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of an automated solid-phase red cell adherence system compared with that of a manual gel microcolumn assay for the identification of antibodies eluted from red blood cells.
    Finck RH; Davis RJ; Teng S; Goldfinger D; Ziman AF; Lu Q; Yuan S
    Immunohematology; 2011; 27(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 22356479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increased alloimmunisation and transfusion reaction reporting in patients with solid-phase panreactivity.
    Olofson AM; Chandler RM; Marx-Wood CR; Babcock CA; Dunbar NM
    J Clin Pathol; 2017 Nov; 70(11):981-983. PubMed ID: 28424235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A multicenter study on the performance of a fully automated, walk-away high-throughput analyzer for pretransfusion testing in the US population.
    Roback JD; Barclay S; Moulds JM; Denomme GA
    Transfusion; 2015 Jun; 55(6 Pt 2):1522-8. PubMed ID: 25753019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Polybrene technique for red cell antibody screening using microplates.
    Lown JA; Ivey JG
    J Clin Pathol; 1988 May; 41(5):556-7. PubMed ID: 3290265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identifying D-positive donors using a second automated testing platform.
    Goldman M; Resz I; Cote J; Ochoa G; Angus N
    Immunohematology; 2013; 29(3):97-100. PubMed ID: 24325169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single-center comparison of gel microcolumn and solid-phase methods for antibody screening.
    Schmidt A; Bendix BJ; Eapen EK; Bryant SC; Stubbs JR
    Immunohematology; 2013; 29(3):101-4. PubMed ID: 24325170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evolution of pretransfusion testing: from agglutination to solid-phase red cell adherence tests.
    Plapp FV; Sinor LT; Rachel JM
    Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci; 1989; 27(2):179-209. PubMed ID: 2656094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selection of GP. Mur antigen-negative RBC for blood recipients with anti-'Mi
    Yang CA; Lin JA; Chang CW; Wu KH; Yeh SP; Ho CM; Chang JG
    Transfus Med; 2016 Oct; 26(5):349-354. PubMed ID: 27634577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [3 new antibody detection tests. A comparative study].
    Mempel W; Alraun K; Leeping M; Kirschner M; Reiser H; Heim MU
    Beitr Infusionsther; 1990; 26():362-6. PubMed ID: 1703872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance and reliability of a benchtop automated instrument for transfusion testing: a comparative multicenter clinical study in the US population.
    Roback JD; Denomme GA; Billingsley K; Bensing K; Parsons JC; McDonough WC
    Transfusion; 2019 Nov; 59(11):3511-3518. PubMed ID: 31532543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Indirect antiglobulin test-crossmatch using low-ionic-strength saline-albumin enhancement medium and reduced incubation time: effectiveness in the detection of most clinically significant antibodies and impact on blood utilization.
    Dinardo CL; Bonifácio SL; Mendrone A
    Immunohematology; 2014; 30(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 25238242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The suitability of hemolyzed specimens for compatibility testing using automated technology.
    Laga A; Cheves T; Maroto S; Coutts M; Sweeney J
    Transfusion; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1713-20. PubMed ID: 18482191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of two robotic platforms to screen plateletpheresis donors for HLA antibodies as part of a transfusion-related acute lung injury mitigation strategy.
    Vassallo RR; Hsu S; Einarson M; Barone J; Brodsky J; Moroff G
    Transfusion; 2010 Aug; 50(8):1766-77. PubMed ID: 20345569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Flow cytometry in pretransfusion testing--detection of red cell antigen-antibody reactions by FCM].
    Tamura M; Takahashi H; Nakayama Y; Kasai M
    Rinsho Byori; 1985 Dec; 33(12):1386-94. PubMed ID: 3831422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Solid phase techniques in blood group serology].
    Uthemann H; Sturmfels L; Lenhard V
    Infusionsther Transfusionsmed; 1993 Jun; 20 Suppl 2():47-51. PubMed ID: 8374289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated detection of red cell antibodies in donor sera using an automated technology.
    Theuriere M; Zelenski KR; Moore VK; Logulo AC
    Transfusion; 1985; 25(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 4002312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Red cell alloimmunisation in oncology patients: A study from eastern India.
    Dhar S; Basu S
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2015 Jun; 52(3):345-9. PubMed ID: 25818996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.