143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2342177)
1. Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: importance of the apical dissection.
Stamey TA; Villers AA; McNeal JE; Link PC; Freiha FS
J Urol; 1990 Jun; 143(6):1166-72; discussion 1172-3. PubMed ID: 2342177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Invasion of Denonvilliers' fascia in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Villers A; McNeal JE; Freiha FS; Boccon-Gibod L; Stamey TA
J Urol; 1993 Apr; 149(4):793-8. PubMed ID: 8455242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer.
Salomon L; Anastasiadis AG; Levrel O; Katz R; Saint F; de la Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Urology; 2003 Feb; 61(2):386-90. PubMed ID: 12597953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Epstein JI; Pizov G; Walsh PC
Cancer; 1993 Jun; 71(11):3582-93. PubMed ID: 7683970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Initial dissection of the lateral fascia reduces the positive margin rate in radical prostatectomy.
Klein EA; Kupelian PA; Tuason L; Levin HS
Urology; 1998 May; 51(5):766-73. PubMed ID: 9610590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen does not reflect biochemical failure rates after radical prostatectomy in men with large volume cancers.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1596-600. PubMed ID: 11025712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Capsular penetration in prostate cancer. Significance for natural history and treatment.
McNeal JE; Villers AA; Redwine EA; Freiha FS; Stamey TA
Am J Surg Pathol; 1990 Mar; 14(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 2305930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Morphologic results of 106 consecutive radical prostatectomy specimen of patients with clinical stage B1-B3 (T2a-c) and histologically negative lymph nodes in the fossa obturatoria].
Hübner D; Henke RP; Hammerer P; Huland H
Urologe A; 1994 Nov; 33(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 7817447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Initial incision of lateral pelvic fascia and early ligation of vascular pedicles during radical prostatectomy: potential to reduce positive margin rates.
Richman M; McLaughlin S; Maygarden S; Pruthi RS
BJU Int; 2005 Jan; 95(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15638893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Morphometric and clinical studies on 68 consecutive radical prostatectomies.
Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Freiha FS; Redwine E
J Urol; 1988 Jun; 139(6):1235-41. PubMed ID: 3373594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: the perineal approach increases the risk of surgically induced positive margins and capsular incisions.
Boccon-Gibod L; Ravery V; Vordos D; Toublanc M; Delmas V; Boccon-Gibod L
J Urol; 1998 Oct; 160(4):1383-5. PubMed ID: 9751359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Morphologic analysis of surgical margins with positive findings in prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
Voges GE; McNeal JE; Redwine EA; Freiha FS; Stamey TA
Cancer; 1992 Jan; 69(2):520-6. PubMed ID: 1728383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of preoperative positive seminal vesicle biopsy on the staging of prostatic cancer.
Vallancien G; Bochereau G; Wetzel O; Bretheau D; Prapotnich D; Bougaran J
J Urol; 1994 Oct; 152(4):1152-6. PubMed ID: 7520948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patterns of positive specimen margins and detectable prostate specific antigen after radical perineal prostatectomy.
Weldon VE; Tavel FR; Neuwirth H; Cohen R
J Urol; 1995 May; 153(5):1565-9. PubMed ID: 7536268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is a positive bladder neck margin truly a T4 lesion in the prostate specific antigen era? Results from the SEARCH Database.
Buschemeyer WC; Hamilton RJ; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
J Urol; 2008 Jan; 179(1):124-9; discussion 129. PubMed ID: 17997433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radical prostatectomy for impalpable prostate cancer: the Johns Hopkins experience with tumors found on transurethral resection (stages T1A and T1B) and on needle biopsy (stage T1C).
Epstein JI; Walsh PC; Brendler CB
J Urol; 1994 Nov; 152(5 Pt 2):1721-9. PubMed ID: 7523719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens].
Compérat E; Camparo P; Srigley J; Delahunt B; Egevad L;
Ann Pathol; 2013 Jun; 33(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 23790653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The incidence and significance of seminal vesicle invasion in patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
Mukamel E; deKernion JB; Hannah J; Smith RB; Skinner DG; Goodwin WE
Cancer; 1987 Apr; 59(8):1535-8. PubMed ID: 3815316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minor modifications in apical dissection of radical retropubic prostatectomy in patients with clinical stage T2 prostate cancer reduce positive surgical margin incidence.
Laven BA; Alsikafi NF; Yang XJ; Brendler CB
Urology; 2004 Jan; 63(1):95-8. PubMed ID: 14751357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Positive margins after radical prostatectomy: correlation with local recurrence and distant progression.
van den Ouden D; Bentvelsen FM; Boevé ER; Schröder FH
Br J Urol; 1993 Oct; 72(4):489-94. PubMed ID: 7505193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]