These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23421971)

  • 1. The influence of affective and cognitive arguments on message judgement and attitude change: The moderating effects of meta-bases and structural bases.
    Keer M; van den Putte B; Neijens P; de Wit J
    Psychol Health; 2013; 28(8):895-908. PubMed ID: 23421971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of integrating instrumental and affective arguments in rhetorical and testimonial health messages.
    Keer M; van den Putte B; de Wit J; Neijens P
    J Health Commun; 2013; 18(9):1148-61. PubMed ID: 23659225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Affective and cognitive meta-bases of attitudes: Unique effects on information interest and persuasion.
    See YH; Petty RE; Fabrigar LR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Jun; 94(6):938-55. PubMed ID: 18505310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is It More Feeling or Thinking? The Influence of Affective and Cognitive Attitude on Adolescents' Intention to Engage in Binge Drinking.
    Boers E; Zebregs S; Hendriks H; Van Den Putte B
    J Health Commun; 2018; 23(5):430-434. PubMed ID: 29693509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Affective-cognitive meta-bases versus structural bases of attitudes predict processing interest versus efficiency.
    See YH; Petty RE; Fabrigar LR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1111-23. PubMed ID: 23754039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Should persuasion be affective or cognitive? The moderating effects of need for affect and need for cognition.
    Haddock G; Maio GR; Arnold K; Huskinson T
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):769-78. PubMed ID: 18344496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of message framing in anti-binge drinking PSAs: the moderating role of counterfactual thinking.
    Baek TH; Shen L; Reid LN
    J Health Commun; 2013; 18(4):442-58. PubMed ID: 23289373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Designing Anti-Binge Drinking Prevention Messages: Message Framing vs. Evidence Type.
    Kang H; Lee MJ
    Health Commun; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1494-1502. PubMed ID: 28952800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reactance to anti-binge drinking messages: testing cognitive and affective mechanisms among noncollege emerging adults.
    Shorey-Fennell BR; Magnan RE
    J Behav Med; 2019 Oct; 42(5):984-990. PubMed ID: 30810959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changing exercise through targeting affective or cognitive attitudes.
    Conner M; Rhodes RE; Morris B; McEachan R; Lawton R
    Psychol Health; 2011 Feb; 26(2):133-49. PubMed ID: 21318926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Message sidedness in advertising: the moderating roles of need for cognition and time pressure in persuasion.
    Kao DT
    Scand J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 52(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 21752025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of diet-related cancer prevention messages written with cognitive and affective arguments on message characteristics, stage of change, and self-efficacy.
    Quintiliani LM; Carbone ET
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2005; 37(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 15745651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cognitive and affective matching effects in persuasion: an amplification perspective.
    Clarkson JJ; Tormala ZL; Rucker DD
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1415-27. PubMed ID: 21734162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An alcohol message beneath the surface of ER: how implicit memory influences viewers' health attitudes and intentions using entertainment-education.
    Kim K; Lee M; Macias W
    J Health Commun; 2014; 19(8):876-92. PubMed ID: 24479746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-guide framing and persuasion: responsibly increasing message processing to ideal levels.
    Evans LM; Petty RE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Mar; 29(3):313-24. PubMed ID: 15273009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sense or sensibility? The neuro-functional basis of the structural matching effect in persuasion.
    Aquino A; Alparone FR; Pagliaro S; Haddock G; Maio GR; Perrucci MG; Ebisch SJH
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 20(3):536-550. PubMed ID: 32185623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring the effect of regulatory focus on ad attitudes: the moderating roles of message sidedness and argument quality.
    Kao DT
    Int J Psychol; 2012; 47(2):142-53. PubMed ID: 22150336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attitudes and attitude change.
    Petty RE; Wegener DT; Fabrigar LR
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1997; 48():609-47. PubMed ID: 9046570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of message frame in anti-smoking public service announcements on cognitive response and attitude toward smoking.
    Shen L
    Health Commun; 2010 Jan; 25(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 20390667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Talking about alcohol consumption: health campaigns, conversational valence, and binge drinking intentions.
    Hendriks H; de Bruijn GJ; van den Putte B
    Br J Health Psychol; 2012 Nov; 17(4):843-53. PubMed ID: 22646524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.