BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2342198)

  • 1. Augmentation cystoplasty utilizing de-epithelialized sigmoid colon: a preliminary study.
    Motley RC; Montgomery BT; Zollman PE; Holley KE; Kramer SA
    J Urol; 1990 Jun; 143(6):1257-60. PubMed ID: 2342198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chemically induced intestinal de-epithelialization using silver nitrate for bladder augmentation.
    Demirbilek S; Aydin G; Ozardali HI; Baykara S
    Urol Res; 2001 Feb; 29(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 11310212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intestinal de-epithelialization and augmentation cystoplasty: an animal model.
    Niku SD; Scherz HC; Stein PC; Parsons CL
    Urology; 1995 Jul; 46(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 7604478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonsecretory sigmoid cystoplasty: experimental and clinical results.
    Lima SV; Araújo LA; Vilar FO; Kummer CL; Lima EC
    J Urol; 1995 May; 153(5):1651-4. PubMed ID: 7715000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grafting of cultured uroepithelium and bladder mucosa into de-epithelialized segments of colon in rabbits.
    Merguerian P; Chavez DR; Hakim S
    J Urol; 1994 Aug; 152(2 Pt 2):671-4. PubMed ID: 8021992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sigmoid cystoplasty with argon beam without mucosa.
    De Badiola F; Ruiz E; Puigdevall J; Lobos P; Moldes J; Lopez Raffo M; Gallo A
    J Urol; 2001 Jun; 165(6 Pt 2):2253-5. PubMed ID: 11371956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of silver nitrate for chemical de-epithelialization and urothelialization of intestine in a rabbit model of augmentation cystoplasty.
    Demirbilek S; Uğuralp S; Gürbüz N; Sezgin N; Kirimlioğlu H
    Urol Res; 2003 Aug; 31(4):236-41. PubMed ID: 12802541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A surgical model of composite cystoplasty with cultured urothelial cells: a controlled study of gross outcome and urothelial phenotype.
    Fraser M; Thomas DF; Pitt E; Harnden P; Trejdosiewicz LK; Southgate J
    BJU Int; 2004 Mar; 93(4):609-16. PubMed ID: 15008741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aerosol transfer of bladder urothelial and smooth muscle cells onto demucosalized colonic segments for bladder augmentation: in vivo, long term, and functional pilot study.
    Hidas G; Lee HJ; Bahoric A; Kelly MS; Watts B; Liu Z; Saharti S; Lusch A; Alamsahebpour A; Kerbl D; Truong H; Zi X; Khoury AE
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Oct; 11(5):260.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26022502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Biological aspects of choice of the intestinal segment for the cystoplasty].
    Kirpatovskiĭ VI; Tilliashaĭkhov MN; Mudraia IS; Golovanov SA; Syromiatnikova EV; Nadtochiĭ ON; Frolova EV
    Urologiia; 2010; (2):27-31. PubMed ID: 20967992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enterocystoplasty using modified pedicled, detubularized, de-epithelialized sigmoid patches in the mini-pig model.
    Lutz N; Frey P
    J Urol; 1995 Aug; 154(2 Pt 2):893-8. PubMed ID: 7609207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Seromuscular colocystoplasty lined with urothelium: experimental study.
    Buson H; Manivel JC; Dayanç M; Long R; Gonzalez R
    Urology; 1994 Nov; 44(5):743-8. PubMed ID: 7974949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seromuscular enterocystoplasty in dogs.
    Salle JL; Fraga JC; Lucib A; Lampertz M; Jobim G; Jobim G; Putten A
    J Urol; 1990 Aug; 144(2 Pt 2):454-6; discussion 460. PubMed ID: 2374219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prevention of colonic mucosal regrowth after seromuscular enterocystoplasty.
    Kïbar Y; Tahmaz L; Ongürü O; Dayanç M
    J Urol; 2001 Jun; 165(6 Pt 1):2059-62. PubMed ID: 11371928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sigmoidocystoplasty to augment bladder capacity.
    Weiss JP; Wein AJ; Hanno PM
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1984 Oct; 159(4):377-80. PubMed ID: 6484795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Urothelial lined colocystoplasty in a sheep model.
    Dewan PA; Lorenz C; Stefanek W; Byard RW
    Eur Urol; 1994; 26(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 7805710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of augmentation cystoplasty on bladder contractility in rabbits.
    Ozkan-Ulu H; Ulu N; Bingol-Kologlu M; Onur R; Aktug T
    J Pediatr Surg; 2008 Jul; 43(7):1347-52. PubMed ID: 18639694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. First prize: ureteral segmental replacement revisited.
    El-Hakim A; Marcovich R; Chiu KY; Lee BR; Smith AD
    J Endourol; 2005 Nov; 19(9):1069-74. PubMed ID: 16283842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of intestinal segment and configuration on the outcome of augmentation enterocystoplasty.
    Sidi AA; Reinberg Y; Gonzalez R
    J Urol; 1986 Dec; 136(6):1201-4. PubMed ID: 3773089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vivo bladder regeneration using small intestinal submucosa: experimental study.
    Caione P; Capozza N; Zavaglia D; Palombaro G; Boldrini R
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2006 Jul; 22(7):593-9. PubMed ID: 16773371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.