These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2342198)

  • 1. Augmentation cystoplasty utilizing de-epithelialized sigmoid colon: a preliminary study.
    Motley RC; Montgomery BT; Zollman PE; Holley KE; Kramer SA
    J Urol; 1990 Jun; 143(6):1257-60. PubMed ID: 2342198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chemically induced intestinal de-epithelialization using silver nitrate for bladder augmentation.
    Demirbilek S; Aydin G; Ozardali HI; Baykara S
    Urol Res; 2001 Feb; 29(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 11310212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intestinal de-epithelialization and augmentation cystoplasty: an animal model.
    Niku SD; Scherz HC; Stein PC; Parsons CL
    Urology; 1995 Jul; 46(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 7604478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonsecretory sigmoid cystoplasty: experimental and clinical results.
    Lima SV; Araújo LA; Vilar FO; Kummer CL; Lima EC
    J Urol; 1995 May; 153(5):1651-4. PubMed ID: 7715000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grafting of cultured uroepithelium and bladder mucosa into de-epithelialized segments of colon in rabbits.
    Merguerian P; Chavez DR; Hakim S
    J Urol; 1994 Aug; 152(2 Pt 2):671-4. PubMed ID: 8021992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sigmoid cystoplasty with argon beam without mucosa.
    De Badiola F; Ruiz E; Puigdevall J; Lobos P; Moldes J; Lopez Raffo M; Gallo A
    J Urol; 2001 Jun; 165(6 Pt 2):2253-5. PubMed ID: 11371956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of silver nitrate for chemical de-epithelialization and urothelialization of intestine in a rabbit model of augmentation cystoplasty.
    Demirbilek S; Uğuralp S; Gürbüz N; Sezgin N; Kirimlioğlu H
    Urol Res; 2003 Aug; 31(4):236-41. PubMed ID: 12802541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A surgical model of composite cystoplasty with cultured urothelial cells: a controlled study of gross outcome and urothelial phenotype.
    Fraser M; Thomas DF; Pitt E; Harnden P; Trejdosiewicz LK; Southgate J
    BJU Int; 2004 Mar; 93(4):609-16. PubMed ID: 15008741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aerosol transfer of bladder urothelial and smooth muscle cells onto demucosalized colonic segments for bladder augmentation: in vivo, long term, and functional pilot study.
    Hidas G; Lee HJ; Bahoric A; Kelly MS; Watts B; Liu Z; Saharti S; Lusch A; Alamsahebpour A; Kerbl D; Truong H; Zi X; Khoury AE
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Oct; 11(5):260.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26022502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Biological aspects of choice of the intestinal segment for the cystoplasty].
    Kirpatovskiĭ VI; Tilliashaĭkhov MN; Mudraia IS; Golovanov SA; Syromiatnikova EV; Nadtochiĭ ON; Frolova EV
    Urologiia; 2010; (2):27-31. PubMed ID: 20967992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enterocystoplasty using modified pedicled, detubularized, de-epithelialized sigmoid patches in the mini-pig model.
    Lutz N; Frey P
    J Urol; 1995 Aug; 154(2 Pt 2):893-8. PubMed ID: 7609207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Seromuscular colocystoplasty lined with urothelium: experimental study.
    Buson H; Manivel JC; Dayanç M; Long R; Gonzalez R
    Urology; 1994 Nov; 44(5):743-8. PubMed ID: 7974949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seromuscular enterocystoplasty in dogs.
    Salle JL; Fraga JC; Lucib A; Lampertz M; Jobim G; Jobim G; Putten A
    J Urol; 1990 Aug; 144(2 Pt 2):454-6; discussion 460. PubMed ID: 2374219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prevention of colonic mucosal regrowth after seromuscular enterocystoplasty.
    Kïbar Y; Tahmaz L; Ongürü O; Dayanç M
    J Urol; 2001 Jun; 165(6 Pt 1):2059-62. PubMed ID: 11371928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sigmoidocystoplasty to augment bladder capacity.
    Weiss JP; Wein AJ; Hanno PM
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1984 Oct; 159(4):377-80. PubMed ID: 6484795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Urothelial lined colocystoplasty in a sheep model.
    Dewan PA; Lorenz C; Stefanek W; Byard RW
    Eur Urol; 1994; 26(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 7805710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of augmentation cystoplasty on bladder contractility in rabbits.
    Ozkan-Ulu H; Ulu N; Bingol-Kologlu M; Onur R; Aktug T
    J Pediatr Surg; 2008 Jul; 43(7):1347-52. PubMed ID: 18639694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. First prize: ureteral segmental replacement revisited.
    El-Hakim A; Marcovich R; Chiu KY; Lee BR; Smith AD
    J Endourol; 2005 Nov; 19(9):1069-74. PubMed ID: 16283842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of intestinal segment and configuration on the outcome of augmentation enterocystoplasty.
    Sidi AA; Reinberg Y; Gonzalez R
    J Urol; 1986 Dec; 136(6):1201-4. PubMed ID: 3773089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vivo bladder regeneration using small intestinal submucosa: experimental study.
    Caione P; Capozza N; Zavaglia D; Palombaro G; Boldrini R
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2006 Jul; 22(7):593-9. PubMed ID: 16773371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.