These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23422634)

  • 21. Reliability of landmark identification in cephalometric radiography acquired by a storage phosphor imaging system.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Huang HW; Yao CC; Chang HF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 15585806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of vertical facial and dentoalveolar changes using panoramic radiography.
    Nohadani N; Ruf S
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 18209215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial variation in normal Saudi population according to Steiner analysis.
    Al-Jasser NM
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Aug; 21(8):746-50. PubMed ID: 11423887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cephalometric superimposition on the occipital condyles as a longitudinal growth assessment reference: I-point and I-curve.
    Standerwick R; Roberts E; Hartsfield J; Babler W; Kanomi R
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2008 Dec; 291(12):1603-10. PubMed ID: 18833570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Facial morphology in children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and moderate to severe temporomandibular joint involvement.
    Hsieh YJ; Darvann TA; Hermann NV; Larsen P; Liao YF; Bjoern-Joergensen J; Kreiborg S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):182-91. PubMed ID: 26827974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Nevoid Basal cell carcinoma syndrome: a cephalometric study of patients and controls.
    Leonardi R; Licciardello V; Santarelli A; Ciavarella D; Bolouri S; Härle F; Caltabiano M; Lo Muzio L
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 20(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 19165028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of the accuracy of cephalometric landmark location between two screen/film combinations.
    Stirrups DR
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 2774297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of sonically derived and traditional cephalometric values.
    Hall DL; Bollen AM
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 9347110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation and Comparison of Anatomical Landmark Detection Methods for Cephalometric X-Ray Images: A Grand Challenge.
    Wang CW; Huang CT; Hsieh MC; Li CH; Chang SW; Li WC; Vandaele R; Marée R; Jodogne S; Geurts P; Chen C; Zheng G; Chu C; Mirzaalian H; Hamarneh G; Vrtovec T; Ibragimov B
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2015 Sep; 34(9):1890-900. PubMed ID: 25794388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Thyroid dose during neurointerventional procedures: does lead shielding reduce the dose?
    Shortt CP; Fanning NF; Malone L; Thornton J; Brennan P; Lee MJ
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(5):922-7. PubMed ID: 17533529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analysis of skeletal maturity of children with cleft palate in terms of healthy children by the CVM method.
    Flieger R; Kopczyński P; Matthews-Brzozowska T
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2015; 24(1):99-102. PubMed ID: 25923093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of dimensional and angular measurements from panoramic and lateral oblique radiographs.
    Wyatt DL; Farman AG; Orbell GM; Silveira AM; Scarfe WC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 9161166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Panoramic radiographs: a tool for investigating skeletal pattern.
    Akcam MO; Altiok T; Ozdiler E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 12594424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Differences between direct (anthropometric) and indirect (cephalometric) measurements of the skull.
    Farkas LG; Tompson BD; Katic MJ; Forrest CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2002 Jan; 13(1):105-8; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11887005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A reflection on radiographic cephalometry: the evaluation of sagittal discrepancy.
    Duterloo HS
    J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 24521748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Radiographic cephalometry of the facial profile.
    Carek V; Jerolimov V; Buković D; Baucić I; Radionov D
    Coll Antropol; 1997 Dec; 21(2):549-54. PubMed ID: 9439072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Radiation doses during panoramic zonography, linear tomography and plain film radiography of maxillo-facial skeleton. A comparative study.
    Paukku P; Göthlin J; Tötterman S; Servomaa A; Hallikainen D
    Eur J Radiol; 1983 Aug; 3(3):239-41. PubMed ID: 6628408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Attempted validation of a method to locate entry and exit foramens of the branches of the trigeminal nerve; benefits for an original cephalometric analysis technique.
    Diouf JS; Badiane A; Ngom PI; Crocquet M; Ousehal L; Diop-Bâ K; Diagne F; Danguy M
    Int Orthod; 2013 Mar; 11(1):104-17. PubMed ID: 23395322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Yao JC; Chang HF
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15132440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Research methods in dentistry 9. Follow-up of permucosal implants in an edentate mandible using panoramic radiography].
    Verhoeven JW; Cune MS
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Mar; 112(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 15792391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.