125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23423724)
1. Stereophotogrammetry-based facial depth measurements: a novel method for quantifying facial projection.
Jayaratne YS; Deutsch CK; Zwahlen RA
Surg Innov; 2014 Feb; 21(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 23423724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional cephalometric norms of Chinese adults in Hong Kong with balanced facial profile.
Cheung LK; Chan YM; Jayaratne YS; Lo J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Aug; 112(2):e56-73. PubMed ID: 21665497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional cephalometry for orthognathic planning: Normative data and analyses.
Wang RH; Ho CT; Lin HH; Lo LJ
J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Jan; 119(1 Pt 2):191-203. PubMed ID: 31003919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantification of facial morphology using stereophotogrammetry--demonstration of a new concept.
Ras F; Habets LL; van Ginkel FC; Prahl-Andersen B
J Dent; 1996 Sep; 24(5):369-74. PubMed ID: 8916654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anterior projection of the maxillomandibular soft tissue complex after surgical correction of maxillary hypoplasia: a Scottish perspective.
O'Donovan M; Khambay BS
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 52(10):934-9. PubMed ID: 25241038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Normative findings for periocular anthropometric measurements among Chinese young adults in Hong Kong.
Jayaratne YS; Deutsch CK; Zwahlen RA
Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():821428. PubMed ID: 23957005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A longitudinal study of facial growth of Southern Chinese in Hong Kong: Comprehensive photogrammetric analyses.
Wen YF; Wong HM; McGrath CP
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186598. PubMed ID: 29053713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anthropometric Evaluation of Periorbital Region and Facial Projection Using Three-Dimensional Photogrammetry.
Jodeh DS; Curtis H; Cray JJ; Ford J; Decker S; Rottgers SA
J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Nov; 29(8):2017-2020. PubMed ID: 30277938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability Study of Angular and Linear Measurements on Facial Morphology Analysis by Means of Stereophotogrammetry.
Andrade LM; Rodrigues da Silva AMB; Magri LV; Rodrigues da Silva MAM
J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 28(4):1107-1111. PubMed ID: 28212123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Utility of three-dimensional soft tissue facial morphometry and conventional cephalometrics in people with normal occlusion].
Guo H; Luo S; Bai Y
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Aug; 21(4):314-7. PubMed ID: 14513594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Soft tissue morphology of the naso-maxillary complex following surgical correction of maxillary hypoplasia.
Ubaya T; Sherriff A; Ayoub A; Khambay B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 41(6):727-32. PubMed ID: 22406234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D extraoral morphometric changes after implant surgery: an exploratory pilot study using stereophotogrammetry.
Ercal P; Calciolari E; Patel R; Zou L; Mardas N; Donos N
Quintessence Int; 2024 May; 55(5):360-371. PubMed ID: 38619259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Photographic facial soft tissue analysis of healthy Turkish young adults: anthropometric measurements.
Ozdemir ST; Sigirli D; Ercan I; Cankur NS
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Mar; 33(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 19089493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Frontal soft tissue analysis using a 3 dimensional camera following two-jaw rotational orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients.
Choi JW; Lee JY; Oh TS; Kwon SM; Yang SJ; Koh KS
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23870714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Esthetic Difference of Chinese Beauty Evaluated by Two Different Human Races Based on Three-Dimensional Average Face Analysis.
Chen C; Chen Y; Li Q; Kau CH
J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 30(5):1435-1440. PubMed ID: 31299738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Soft tissue response in orthognathic surgery patients treated by bimaxillary osteotomy: cephalometry compared with 2-D photogrammetry.
Rustemeyer J; Martin A
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 17(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 22562282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative facial asymmetry: using three-dimensional photogrammetry to measure baseline facial surface symmetry.
Taylor HO; Morrison CS; Linden O; Phillips B; Chang J; Byrne ME; Sullivan SR; Forrest CR
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 24406564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Soft tissue response and facial symmetry after orthognathic surgery.
Wermker K; Kleinheinz J; Jung S; Dirksen D
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):e339-45. PubMed ID: 24529350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D stereophotogrammetry versus traditional craniofacial anthropometry: Comparing measurements from the 3D facial norms database to Farkas's North American norms.
Weinberg SM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 May; 155(5):693-701. PubMed ID: 31053285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement.
Ghoddousi H; Edler R; Haers P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17113754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
