BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23423737)

  • 21. Automations influence on nuclear power plants: a look at three accidents and how automation played a role.
    Schmitt K
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4545-51. PubMed ID: 22317420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The long-term management of nuclear emergencies: the principles.
    Baverstock K; Cherp A; Gray P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):3-5. PubMed ID: 15238648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Radionuclide concentrations in air particulate at Palermo (Italy) following Fukushima accident.
    Rizzo S; Tomarchio E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013; 153(4):534-40. PubMed ID: 22847867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mental Health Consequences of the Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima Nuclear Disasters: A Scoping Review.
    Oe M; Takebayashi Y; Sato H; Maeda M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(14):. PubMed ID: 34299933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lessons Learned from the Accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant-More than Basic Knowledge: Education and its Effects Improve the Preparedness and Response to Radiation Emergency.
    Hachiya M; Akashi M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 171(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 27466457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Chernobyl, Fukushima, and beyond: a health safety perspective.
    Sarin R
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2011; 7(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 21768693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparisons of effective half-lives of radiocesium in Japanese tea plants after two nuclear accidents, Chernobyl and Fukushima.
    Tagami K; Uchida S; Shinano T; Pröhl G
    J Environ Radioact; 2020 Mar; 213():106109. PubMed ID: 31756642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the accident process, radioactivity release and ground contamination between Chernobyl and Fukushima-1.
    Imanaka T; Hayashi G; Endo S
    J Radiat Res; 2015 Dec; 56 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i56-61. PubMed ID: 26568603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Health after Fukushima. A current perspective].
    Zeeb H; Müller S
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2011 Jul; 54(7):886-9. PubMed ID: 21698543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Potassium iodide for thyroid blockade in a reactor accident: administrative policies that govern its use.
    Becker DV; Zanzonico P
    Thyroid; 1997 Apr; 7(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 9133683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Current Measures on Radioactive Contamination in Japan: A Policy Situation Analysis.
    Gilmour S; Miyagawa S; Kasuga F; Shibuya K
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0152040. PubMed ID: 27007509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Fukushima nuclear disaster is ongoing.
    Marks AR
    J Clin Invest; 2016 Jul; 126(7):2385-7. PubMed ID: 27214552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Tenth Warren K. Sinclair keynote address-the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident and comprehensive health risk management.
    Yamashita S
    Health Phys; 2014 Feb; 106(2):166-80. PubMed ID: 24378490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Accidents of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plants and future].
    Hoshi M
    Igaku Butsuri; 2012; 32(4):197-201. PubMed ID: 24568025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Comparison of Remediation After The Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi Accidents.
    Howard BJ; Fesenko S; Balonov M; Pröhl G; Nakayama S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 173(1-3):170-176. PubMed ID: 27886996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Global nuclear industry views: challenges arising from the evolution of the optimisation principle in radiological protection.
    Saint-Pierre S
    Ann ICRP; 2012; 41(3-4):275-81. PubMed ID: 23089026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. INDIVIDUAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING AFTER MAJOR RELEASES OF RADIONUCLIDES TO THE ENVIRONMENT.
    Berkovski V; Ratia G; Bonchuk Y
    Probl Radiac Med Radiobiol; 2018 Dec; 23():37-48. PubMed ID: 30582835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Consequences of atmospheric contamination by radioiodine: the Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents.
    Ory C; Leboulleux S; Salvatore D; Le Guen B; De Vathaire F; Chevillard S; Schlumberger M
    Endocrine; 2021 Feb; 71(2):298-309. PubMed ID: 33025561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Monitoring of radioactive substances in foods distributed in Kyoto, Japan (1991-2011). - Comparison of detection rates and concentrations before and after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident - .
    Banno Y; Namikawa M; Miwa M; Ban S; Orito T; Semura S; Kawakami M; Doi N; Miyake S; Ishikawa Y
    Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2013; 54(3):178-87. PubMed ID: 23863362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Applicability of health physics lessons learned from the Three Mile Island Unit 2 accident to the Fukushima Daiichi accident.
    Bevelacqua JJ
    J Environ Radioact; 2012 Feb; 105():6-10. PubMed ID: 22230016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.