These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23423737)

  • 101. [Measures against Radiation Exposure Due to Large-Scale Nuclear Accident in Distant Place--Radioactive Materials in Nagasaki from Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant].
    Yuan J; Sera K; Takatsuji T
    Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2015; 70(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 25994347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 102. Early radiation survey of Iitate village, which was heavily contaminated by the Fukushima Daiichi accident, conducted on 28 and 29 March 2011.
    Imanaka T; Endo S; Sugai M; Ozawa S; Shizuma K; Yamamoto M
    Health Phys; 2012 Jun; 102(6):680-6. PubMed ID: 22549322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 103. Assessment of environmental public exposure from a hypothetical nuclear accident for Unit-1 Bushehr nuclear power plant.
    Sohrabi M; Ghasemi M; Amrollahi R; Khamooshi C; Parsouzi Z
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2013 May; 52(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 23358597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 104. A review of the impact on the ecosystem after ionizing irradiation: wildlife population.
    Cannon G; Kiang JG
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2022; 98(6):1054-1062. PubMed ID: 32663058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 105. Guidelines for exposure assessment in health risk studies following a nuclear reactor accident.
    Bouville A; Linet MS; Hatch M; Mabuchi K; Simon SL
    Environ Health Perspect; 2014 Jan; 122(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 24184886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 106. Chornobyl exclusion zone: current status and challenges.
    Pareniuk O; Yasuda N
    Ann ICRP; 2021 Jul; 50(1_suppl):201-208. PubMed ID: 34281422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 107. Radiation accidents and their management: emphasis on the role of nuclear medicine professionals.
    Bomanji JB; Novruzov F; Vinjamuri S
    Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Oct; 35(10):995-1002. PubMed ID: 25004166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 108. Managing the Fukushima challenge.
    Suzuki A
    Risk Anal; 2014 Jul; 34(7):1240-56. PubMed ID: 24954604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 109. A tale of two forests: addressing postnuclear radiation at Chernobyl and Fukushima.
    Bird WA; Little JB
    Environ Health Perspect; 2013 Mar; 121(3):A78-85. PubMed ID: 23454631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 110. Radioactive releases from the nuclear power sector and implications for child health.
    Folkers C; Gunter LP
    BMJ Paediatr Open; 2022 Oct; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 36645750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 111. Regulatory approach to management of radioactive waste generated during remediation activities in the Chernobyl contaminated areas.
    Rozdyalouskaya LF
    Ann ICRP; 2021 Jul; 50(1_suppl):194-200. PubMed ID: 34261368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 112. The status of the radiation safety culture within the higher education, research and teaching sectors in the UK.
    Coldwell T; Cole P; Dorling S; Hunter J; Mott G; Murdock C; Whitcher R; Willis S
    J Radiol Prot; 2020 Nov; 40(4):. PubMed ID: 33105110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 113. Returning Home after Decontamination? Applying the Protective Action Decision Model to a Nuclear Accident Scenario.
    Rasmussen J; Wikström PB
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jun; 19(12):. PubMed ID: 35742732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 114. A High-Performance Gamma Spectrometer for Unmanned Systems Based on Off-the-Shelf Components.
    Chierici A; Malizia A; Di Giovanni D; Ciolini R; d'Errico F
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 35161824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 115. Accident Simulation Study for Nuclear Power Plants Impacting Louisiana: Differences in 2017 vs. 1992 Protective Action Guidelines.
    McMahon MD; Chancellor JC
    Health Phys; 2022 Sep; 123(3):218-228. PubMed ID: 35678725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 116. The "Brookhaven Brassie" and the Response to the Three Mile Island Accident.
    Studer NM
    Health Phys; 2021 Dec; 121(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 34593677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 117. Domain- and task-analytic workload (DTAW) method: a methodology for predicting mental workload during severe accidents in nuclear power plants.
    Liu Y; Gao Q; Wu M
    Ergonomics; 2023 Feb; 66(2):261-290. PubMed ID: 35608031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 118. Comparative Analysis of Emergency Planning Zone and Control Room Habitability for Potential Nuclear Reactor Deployment in Ghana.
    Christina P; Kim J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Sep; 19(18):. PubMed ID: 36141467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 119. The role of experts in the development of recovery handbooks: UK and European experience.
    Nisbet AF
    Ann ICRP; 2021 Jul; 50(1_suppl):116-121. PubMed ID: 34130524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 120. An open time-series simulated dataset covering various accidents for nuclear power plants.
    Qi B; Xiao X; Liang J; Po LC; Zhang L; Tong J
    Sci Data; 2022 Dec; 9(1):766. PubMed ID: 36513714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.