250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23425220)
1. Application of random match probability calculations to mixed STR profiles.
Bille T; Bright JA; Buckleton J
J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):474-85. PubMed ID: 23425220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identifying contributors of DNA mixtures by means of quantitative information of STR typing.
Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
J Comput Biol; 2012 Jul; 19(7):887-902. PubMed ID: 21210742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the FBI's Native American STR database for random match probability calculations.
Ng J; Oldt RF; Kanthaswamy S
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2018 Jan; 30():52-55. PubMed ID: 29175583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inclusion probability for DNA mixtures is a subjective one-sided match statistic unrelated to identification information.
Perlin MW
J Pathol Inform; 2015; 6():59. PubMed ID: 26605124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the performance of different models for the interpretation of low level mixed DNA profiles.
Bille TW; Weitz SM; Coble MD; Buckleton J; Bright JA
Electrophoresis; 2014 Nov; 35(21-22):3125-33. PubMed ID: 25168355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interpreting Y chromosome STR haplotype mixture.
Ge J; Budowle B; Chakraborty R
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2010 May; 12(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 20346725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):516-28. PubMed ID: 23948322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Complex DNA mixture analysis in a forensic context: evaluating the probative value using a likelihood ratio model.
Haned H; Benschop CCG; Gill PD; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():17-25. PubMed ID: 25485478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of forensic DNA mixture evidence: protocol for evaluation, interpretation, and statistical calculations using the combined probability of inclusion.
Bieber FR; Buckleton JS; Budowle B; Butler JM; Coble MD
BMC Genet; 2016 Aug; 17(1):125. PubMed ID: 27580588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to mixtures.
Slooten KJ; Egeland T
Int J Legal Med; 2016 Jan; 130(1):39-57. PubMed ID: 26160753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. NIST interlaboratory studies involving DNA mixtures (MIX13): A modern analysis.
Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Cheng K; Budowle B; Coble MD
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():172-179. PubMed ID: 30176439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Database extraction strategies for low-template evidence.
Bleka Ø; Dørum G; Haned H; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():134-41. PubMed ID: 24528591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validating TrueAllele
Bauer DW; Butt N; Hornyak JM; Perlin MW
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):380-398. PubMed ID: 31580496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accurate assessment of the weight of evidence for DNA mixtures by integrating the likelihood ratio.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():1-16. PubMed ID: 27914277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel set of DIP-STR markers for improved analysis of challenging DNA mixtures.
Oldoni F; Castella V; Hall D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():156-164. PubMed ID: 26232274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
