250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23425220)
41. My-Forensic-Loci-queries (MyFLq) framework for analysis of forensic STR data generated by massive parallel sequencing.
Van Neste C; Vandewoestyne M; Van Criekinge W; Deforce D; Van Nieuwerburgh F
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():1-8. PubMed ID: 24528572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains.
Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Mar; 1(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19083724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Verifying likelihoods for low template DNA profiles using multiple replicates.
Steele CD; Greenhalgh M; Balding DJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():82-9. PubMed ID: 25082140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Quantification of forensic genetic evidence: Comparison of results obtained by qualitative and quantitative software for real casework samples.
Costa C; Figueiredo C; Amorim A; Costa S; Ferreira PM; Pinto N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102715. PubMed ID: 35490558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. ForeStatistics: A windows-based feature-rich software program for performing statistics in forensic DNA analysis, paternity and relationship testing.
Rasool N; Hussain W
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Feb; 307():110142. PubMed ID: 31927396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Do low template DNA profiles have useful quantitative data?
Taylor D; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():13-16. PubMed ID: 25474687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. MaSTR™: an effective probabilistic genotyping tool for interpretation of STR mixtures associated with differentially degraded DNA.
Holland MM; Tiedge TM; Bender AJ; Gaston-Sanchez SA; McElhoe JA
Int J Legal Med; 2022 Mar; 136(2):433-446. PubMed ID: 35092470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Estimating the probability of allelic drop-out of STR alleles in forensic genetics.
Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 19647706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. PENDULUM--a guideline-based approach to the interpretation of STR mixtures.
Bill M; Gill P; Curran J; Clayton T; Pinchin R; Healy M; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Mar; 148(2-3):181-9. PubMed ID: 15639613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Performance of a method for weighting a range in the number of contributors in probabilistic genotyping.
McGovern C; Cheng K; Kelly H; Ciecko A; Taylor D; Buckleton JS; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102352. PubMed ID: 32707473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A sensitivity analysis to determine the robustness of STRmix™ with respect to laboratory calibration.
Kelly H; Bright JA; Kruijver M; Cooper S; Taylor D; Duke K; Strong M; Beamer V; Buettner C; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():113-122. PubMed ID: 29727813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Mixture interpretation: Experimental and simulated reevaluation of qualitative analysis.
Manabe S; Mori Y; Kawai C; Ozeki M; Tamaki K
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2013 Mar; 15(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 23089142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The 'factor of two' issue in mixed DNA profiles.
Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
J Theor Biol; 2014 Dec; 363():300-6. PubMed ID: 25158162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Interpretation of complex forensic DNA mixtures.
Ladd C; Lee HC; Yang N; Bieber FR
Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):244-6. PubMed ID: 11387631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Combining evidence across multiple mixed DNA profiles for improved resolution of a donor when a common contributor can be assumed.
Taylor D; Kruijver M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Nov; 49():102375. PubMed ID: 32937256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. An investigation of the potential of DIP-STR markers for DNA mixture analyses.
Cereda G; Biedermann A; Hall D; Taroni F
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jul; 11():229-40. PubMed ID: 24815373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method.
Biedermann A; Bozza S; Konis K; Taroni F
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 22534257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Does an English appeal court ruling increase the risks of miscarriages of justice when complex DNA profiles are searched against the national DNA database?
Gill P; Bleka Ø; Egeland T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():167-75. PubMed ID: 25151459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A new strategy for sperm isolation and STR typing from multi-donor sperm mixtures.
Han JP; Yang F; Xu C; Wei YL; Zhao XC; Hu L; Ye J; Li CX
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():239-46. PubMed ID: 25240154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Analysis of matches and partial-matches in a Danish STR data set.
Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Curran JM; Mogensen HS; Morling N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 May; 6(3):387-92. PubMed ID: 21900065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
